Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Structural correlates of language processing in primary progressive aphasia

  • Curtiss A. Chapman
  • , Maryna Polyakova
  • , Karsten Mueller
  • , Christopher Weise
  • , Klaus Fassbender
  • , Klaus Fliessbach
  • , Johannes Kornhuber
  • , Martin Lauer
  • , Sarah Anderl-Straub
  • , Albert Ludolph
  • , Johannes Prudlo
  • , Anja Staiger
  • , Matthis Synofzik
  • , Jens Wiltfang
  • , Lina Riedl
  • , Janine Diehl-Schmid
  • , Markus Otto
  • , Adrian Danek
  • , Gesa Hartwigsen
  • , Matthias L. Schroeter
  • Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
  • University of Leipzig
  • Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
  • Saarland University Medical Center
  • University of Bonn and University Hospital Bonn
  • German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE)
  • Universitätsklinikum Erlangen
  • University Hospital Würzburg
  • University of Ulm
  • Rostock University Medical Center
  • University of Munich
  • University Clinic Tuebingen
  • University Medical Center
  • Technical University of Munich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Understanding the relationships between brain structure and language behaviour in primary progressive aphasia provides crucial information about these diseases' pathomechanisms. However, previous investigations have been limited from providing a statistically reliable view of broad language abilities by sample size, variant focus and task focus. In this study, the authors aimed to determine the relationship between brain structure and language behaviour in primary progressive aphasia, to determine the degree to which task-associated regions were atrophied across disease variants and to determine the degree to which task-related atrophy overlaps across disease variants. Participants were 118 primary progressive aphasia patients and 61 healthy, age-matched controls tested from 2011 to 2018 in the German Consortium for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration cohort. Diagnosis of primary progressive aphasia required progressive deterioration of mainly speech and language for ≥ 2 years, and variant was diagnosed by the criteria of Gorno-Tempini et al. (Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology. 2011;76(11):1006-1014). Twenty-one participants not fulfilling a specific subtype were classified as mixed-variant and excluded. Language tasks of interest included the Boston naming test, a German adaptation of the Repeat and Point task, phonemic and category fluency tasks and the reading/writing subtest of the Aachen Aphasia Test. Brain structure was measured by cortical thickness. We observed networks of language task-associated temporal, frontal and parietal cortex. Overlapping task-associated atrophy was observed in the left lateral, ventral and medial temporal lobes, middle and superior frontal gyri, supramarginal gyrus and insula. Some regions, primarily in the perisylvian region, were associated with language behaviour despite showing no significant atrophy. The results crucially extend less powerful studies associating brain and language measures in primary progressive aphasia. Cross-variant atrophy in task-associated regions suggests partially shared underlying deficits, whereas unique atrophy reinforces variant-specific deficits. Language task-related regions that are not obviously atrophied suggest regions of future network disruption and encourage understanding of task deficits beyond clearly atrophied cortex. These results may pave the way for new treatment approaches.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberfcad076
JournalBrain Communications
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • cortical thickness
  • language
  • primary progressive aphasia
  • semantics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Structural correlates of language processing in primary progressive aphasia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this