Structural changes in the German pharmaceutical market: Price setting mechanisms based on the early benefit evaluation

Cornelia Henschke, Leonie Sundmacher, Reinhard Busse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

42 Scopus citations

Abstract

In the past, free price setting mechanisms in Germany led to high prices of patented pharmaceuticals and to increasing expenditures in the pharmaceutical sector. In order to control patented pharmaceutical prices and to curb increasing pharmaceutical spending, the Act for Restructuring the Pharmaceutical Market in Statutory Health Insurance (AMNOG) came into effect on 1st January 2011. In a structured dossier, pharmaceutical manufacturers have to demonstrate the additional therapeutic benefit of the newly approved pharmaceutical compared to its appropriate comparator. According to the level of additional benefit, pharmaceuticals will be subject to price negotiations between the Federal Association of Statutory Health Insurance Funds and the pharmaceutical company concerned (or assigned to a reference price group in case of no additional benefit). Therefore, the health care reform is a first step to decision making based on " value for money" . The process of price setting based on early benefit evaluation has an impact on the German as well as the European pharmaceutical markets. Therefore, these structural changes in Germany are of importance for pricing decisions in many European countries both from a political point of view and for strategic planning for pharmaceutical manufacturers, which may have an effect on insured patients' access to pharmaceuticals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)263-269
Number of pages7
JournalHealth Policy
Volume109
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • AMNOG
  • German reform
  • Pharmaceuticals
  • Pricing and reimbursement

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Structural changes in the German pharmaceutical market: Price setting mechanisms based on the early benefit evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this