Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Statistical Analysis and Reporting of Cardiac Output Method Comparison Studies (COMPARE) Statement

  • Bernd Saugel
  • , Alexander Hapfelmeier
  • , Moritz Flick
  • , Joseph Rinehart
  • , Robert H. Thiele
  • , Simon T. Vistisen
  • , Karsten Bartels
  • , Maxime Cannesson
  • , Maurizio Cecconi
  • , Michelle S. Chew
  • , Daniel De Backer
  • , Alexandre Joosten
  • , Ashish K. Khanna
  • , Jerrold H. Levy
  • , Agnes S. Meidert
  • , Antonio Messina
  • , Xavier Monnet
  • , Sheila N. Myatra
  • , Michael R. Pinsky
  • , Alparslan Turan
  • Iwan C.C. Van Der Horst, Jean Louis Vincent, Karim Kouz
  • Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
  • Outcomes Research Consortium
  • University of California-Irvine
  • University of Virginia
  • Aarhus University
  • University of Michigan Medical School
  • David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
  • Humanitas University
  • Humanitas Clinical and Research Center
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles
  • Wake Forest School of Medicine
  • Duke University
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
  • Inserm UMR-S999
  • Tata Memorial Hospital
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • McGovern Medical School
  • Maastricht University Medical Center
  • Maastricht University
  • Free University of Brussels

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Cardiac output is a key cardiovascular variable quantifying global blood flow. The measurement performance of cardiac output monitoring methods is investigated in validation studies, which are method comparison studies determining the agreement between cardiac output values measured with a test method and those measured with a reference method. The StatistiCal analysis and repOrting of cardiac output Method comPARison studiEs (COMPARE) statement provides a framework for designing, performing, and reporting cardiac output method comparison studies and includes a checklist of 29 items that are essential for reporting of those studies. Considering and reporting the items specified in the COMPARE checklist will help standardize cardiac output method comparison studies and increase the external validity of the results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)518-532
Number of pages15
JournalAnesthesiology
Volume143
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Statistical Analysis and Reporting of Cardiac Output Method Comparison Studies (COMPARE) Statement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this