St John's wort for depression: Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Klaus Linde, Michael Berner, Matthias Egger, Cynthia Mulrow

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

187 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Extracts of Hypericum perforatum (St John's wort) are widely used to treat depression. Evidence for its efficacy has been criticised on methodological grounds. Aims: To update evidence from randomised trials regarding the effectiveness of Hypericum extracts. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of 37 double-blind randomised controlled trials that compared clinical effects of Hypericum monopreparation with either placebo or a standard antidepressant in adults with depressive disorders. Results: Larger placebo-controlled trials restricted to patients with major depression showed only minor effects over placebo, while older and smaller trials not restricted to patients with major depression showed marked effects. Compared with standard antidepressants Hypericum extracts had similar effects. Conclusions: Current evidence regarding Hypericum extracts is inconsistent and confusing. In patients who meet criteria for major depression, several recent placebo-controlled trials suggest that Hypericum has minimal beneficial effects while other trials suggest that Hypericum and standard antidepressants have similar beneficial effects.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)99-107
Number of pages9
JournalBritish Journal of Psychiatry
Volume186
Issue numberFEB.
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2005

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'St John's wort for depression: Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this