Speech Intelligibility in Noise with a Single-Unit Cochlear Implant Audio Processor

Wilhelm Wimmer, Marco Caversaccio, Martin Kompis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction The Rondo is a single-unit cochlear implant (CI) audio processor comprising the identical components as its behind-the-ear predecessor, the Opus 2. An interchange of the Opus 2 with the Rondo leads to a shift of the microphone position toward the back of the head. This study aimed to investigate the influence of the Rondo wearing position on speech intelligibility in noise. Methods Speech intelligibility in noise was measured in 4 spatial configurations with 12 experienced CI users using the German adaptive Oldenburg sentence test. A physical model and a numerical model were used to enable a comparison of the observations. Results No statistically significant differences of the speech intelligibility were found in the situations in which the signal came from the front and the noise came from the frontal, ipsilateral, or contralateral side. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was significantly better with the Opus 2 in the case with the noise presented from the back (4.4 dB, p < 0.001). The differences in the SNR were significantly worse with the Rondo processors placed further behind the ear than closer to the ear. Conclusion The study indicates that CI users with the receiver/stimulator implanted in positions further behind the ear are expected to have higher difficulties in noisy situations when wearing the single-unit audio processor.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1197-1202
Number of pages6
JournalOtology and Neurotology
Volume36
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 27 Aug 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Microphone position
  • Oldenburg sentence test
  • Rigid sphere diffraction
  • Rondo
  • Speech in noise modeling

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Speech Intelligibility in Noise with a Single-Unit Cochlear Implant Audio Processor'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this