TY - JOUR
T1 - Speech intelligibility in noise with a pinna effect imitating cochlear implant processor
AU - Wimmer, Wilhelm
AU - Weder, Stefan
AU - Caversaccio, Marco
AU - Kompis, Martin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright 2015 Otology & Neurotology, Inc.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Objective: To evaluate the speech intelligibility in noise with a new cochlear implant (CI) processor that uses a pinna effect imitating directional microphone system. Study Design: Prospective experimental study. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Ten experienced, unilateral CI recipients with bilateral severe-To-profound hearing loss. Intervention: All participants performed speech in noise tests with the Opus 2 processor (omnidirectional microphone mode only) and the newer Sonnet processor (omnidirectional and directional microphone mode). Main Outcome Measure: The speech reception threshold (SRT) in noise was measured in four spatial settings. The test sentences were always presented from the front. The noise was arriving either from the front (S0N0), the ipsilateral side of the CI (S0NIL), the contralateral side of the CI (S0NCL), or the back (S0N180). Results: The directional mode improved the SRTs by 3.6 dB ( p<0.01), 2.2 dB ( p<0.01), and 1.3 dB ( p<0.05) in the S0N180, S0NIL, and S0NCL situations, when compared with the Sonnet in the omnidirectional mode. There was no statistically significant difference in the S0N0 situation. No differences between the Opus 2 and the Sonnet in the omnidirectional mode were observed. Conclusion: Speech intelligibility with the Sonnet system was statistically different to speech recognition with the Opus 2 system suggesting that CI users might profit from the pinna effect imitating directionality mode in noisy environments. .
AB - Objective: To evaluate the speech intelligibility in noise with a new cochlear implant (CI) processor that uses a pinna effect imitating directional microphone system. Study Design: Prospective experimental study. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Ten experienced, unilateral CI recipients with bilateral severe-To-profound hearing loss. Intervention: All participants performed speech in noise tests with the Opus 2 processor (omnidirectional microphone mode only) and the newer Sonnet processor (omnidirectional and directional microphone mode). Main Outcome Measure: The speech reception threshold (SRT) in noise was measured in four spatial settings. The test sentences were always presented from the front. The noise was arriving either from the front (S0N0), the ipsilateral side of the CI (S0NIL), the contralateral side of the CI (S0NCL), or the back (S0N180). Results: The directional mode improved the SRTs by 3.6 dB ( p<0.01), 2.2 dB ( p<0.01), and 1.3 dB ( p<0.05) in the S0N180, S0NIL, and S0NCL situations, when compared with the Sonnet in the omnidirectional mode. There was no statistically significant difference in the S0N0 situation. No differences between the Opus 2 and the Sonnet in the omnidirectional mode were observed. Conclusion: Speech intelligibility with the Sonnet system was statistically different to speech recognition with the Opus 2 system suggesting that CI users might profit from the pinna effect imitating directionality mode in noisy environments. .
KW - Directional microphone systems
KW - Oldenburg sentence test
KW - Sonnet
KW - Speech reception threshold
KW - Two-microphone noise reduction.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952717190&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000866
DO - 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000866
M3 - Article
C2 - 26427637
AN - SCOPUS:84952717190
SN - 1531-7129
VL - 37
SP - 19
EP - 23
JO - Otology and Neurotology
JF - Otology and Neurotology
IS - 1
ER -