TY - JOUR
T1 - Spatial variation of nitrate-N and related soil properties at the plot-scale
AU - Stenger, R.
AU - Priesack, E.
AU - Beese, F.
N1 - Funding Information:
The scientific activities of the FAM Research Network on Agroecosystems are financially supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF 0339370). Overhead costs of the Research Station Scheyern are funded by the Bavarian State Ministry for Science, Research and the Arts. We thank the technical staff at the Institute of Soil Ecology, especially Mrs. Gudrun Hufnagel and Mrs. Sonja Behrens.
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - Neglecting the spatial variation in soil nutrient status may result in unused yield potential and in environmental damage. Site-specific management has been suggested to reduce inappropriate fertilization that can adversely affect soil, ground and surface water. Decision criteria for determining variable-rate nitrogen fertilization are, however, lacking. This paper analyses the spatial variation of nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N) and soil properties related to the N cycle at the plot-scale. Three 50 × 50 m plots were sampled in nested sampling designs of varying complexities. Classical statistics revealed a characteristic ranking in the variability of soil properties. Geostatistical analysis of the NO3-N data from two plots showed that the small-scale variation found in one small subgrid was not typical for the small-scale variation in the entire plot, indicating bias in the sampling design. A trend component was found in the NO3-N data and, consequently, the minimal requirement for the regionalized variable theory was not fulfilled. Problems due to design were overcome with a more complex nested sampling at the third plot. However, the spherical model fitted to the NO3-N data of the first year explained only 21% of the total variance, whereas a pure nugget effect was observed in the second year. The water content data also showed a low structural variance, which was different in the two years. In contrast, two thirds of the variance of total carbon (Ct) and total nitrogen (Nt) could be explained by the fitted models. Seasonal variations, such as varying duration of snow cover, and extrinsic management effects, such as growing of a cover crop, may have contributed to the observed differences in variability between the years. Due to the low proportion of structural variance and the observation that spatial distribution was not stable with time, geostatistical analysis of NO3-N and water contents data added only little information to classical statistical analysis. However, geostatistical analysis of total C and N contents provided a useful means to calculate spatial distribution patterns of these properties.
AB - Neglecting the spatial variation in soil nutrient status may result in unused yield potential and in environmental damage. Site-specific management has been suggested to reduce inappropriate fertilization that can adversely affect soil, ground and surface water. Decision criteria for determining variable-rate nitrogen fertilization are, however, lacking. This paper analyses the spatial variation of nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N) and soil properties related to the N cycle at the plot-scale. Three 50 × 50 m plots were sampled in nested sampling designs of varying complexities. Classical statistics revealed a characteristic ranking in the variability of soil properties. Geostatistical analysis of the NO3-N data from two plots showed that the small-scale variation found in one small subgrid was not typical for the small-scale variation in the entire plot, indicating bias in the sampling design. A trend component was found in the NO3-N data and, consequently, the minimal requirement for the regionalized variable theory was not fulfilled. Problems due to design were overcome with a more complex nested sampling at the third plot. However, the spherical model fitted to the NO3-N data of the first year explained only 21% of the total variance, whereas a pure nugget effect was observed in the second year. The water content data also showed a low structural variance, which was different in the two years. In contrast, two thirds of the variance of total carbon (Ct) and total nitrogen (Nt) could be explained by the fitted models. Seasonal variations, such as varying duration of snow cover, and extrinsic management effects, such as growing of a cover crop, may have contributed to the observed differences in variability between the years. Due to the low proportion of structural variance and the observation that spatial distribution was not stable with time, geostatistical analysis of NO3-N and water contents data added only little information to classical statistical analysis. However, geostatistical analysis of total C and N contents provided a useful means to calculate spatial distribution patterns of these properties.
KW - Heterogeneity
KW - Site-specific management
KW - Spatial variation
KW - Temporal variation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036141734&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0016-7061(01)00107-0
DO - 10.1016/S0016-7061(01)00107-0
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0036141734
SN - 0016-7061
VL - 105
SP - 259
EP - 275
JO - Geoderma
JF - Geoderma
IS - 3-4
ER -