TY - JOUR
T1 - Spatial sampling of weather data for regional crop yield simulations
AU - van Bussel, Lenny G.J.
AU - Ewert, Frank
AU - Zhao, Gang
AU - Hoffmann, Holger
AU - Enders, Andreas
AU - Wallach, Daniel
AU - Asseng, Senthold
AU - Baigorria, Guillermo A.
AU - Basso, Bruno
AU - Biernath, Christian
AU - Cammarano, Davide
AU - Chryssanthacopoulos, James
AU - Constantin, Julie
AU - Elliott, Joshua
AU - Glotter, Michael
AU - Heinlein, Florian
AU - Kersebaum, Kurt Christian
AU - Klein, Christian
AU - Nendel, Claas
AU - Priesack, Eckart
AU - Raynal, Hélène
AU - Romero, Consuelo C.
AU - Rötter, Reimund P.
AU - Specka, Xenia
AU - Tao, Fulu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2016/4/15
Y1 - 2016/4/15
N2 - Field-scale crop models are increasingly applied at spatio-temporal scales that range from regions to the globe and from decades up to 100 years. Sufficiently detailed data to capture the prevailing spatio-temporal heterogeneity in weather, soil, and management conditions as needed by crop models are rarely available. Effective sampling may overcome the problem of missing data but has rarely been investigated. In this study the effect of sampling weather data has been evaluated for simulating yields of winter wheat in a region in Germany over a 30-year period (1982-2011) using 12 process-based crop models. A stratified sampling was applied to compare the effect of different sizes of spatially sampled weather data (10, 30, 50, 100, 500, 1000 and full coverage of 34,078 sampling points) on simulated wheat yields. Stratified sampling was further compared with random sampling. Possible interactions between sample size and crop model were evaluated. The results showed differences in simulated yields among crop models but all models reproduced well the pattern of the stratification. Importantly, the regional mean of simulated yields based on full coverage could already be reproduced by a small sample of 10 points. This was also true for reproducing the temporal variability in simulated yields but more sampling points (about 100) were required to accurately reproduce spatial yield variability. The number of sampling points can be smaller when a stratified sampling is applied as compared to a random sampling. However, differences between crop models were observed including some interaction between the effect of sampling on simulated yields and the model used. We concluded that stratified sampling can considerably reduce the number of required simulations. But, differences between crop models must be considered as the choice for a specific model can have larger effects on simulated yields than the sampling strategy. Assessing the impact of sampling soil and crop management data for regional simulations of crop yields is still needed.
AB - Field-scale crop models are increasingly applied at spatio-temporal scales that range from regions to the globe and from decades up to 100 years. Sufficiently detailed data to capture the prevailing spatio-temporal heterogeneity in weather, soil, and management conditions as needed by crop models are rarely available. Effective sampling may overcome the problem of missing data but has rarely been investigated. In this study the effect of sampling weather data has been evaluated for simulating yields of winter wheat in a region in Germany over a 30-year period (1982-2011) using 12 process-based crop models. A stratified sampling was applied to compare the effect of different sizes of spatially sampled weather data (10, 30, 50, 100, 500, 1000 and full coverage of 34,078 sampling points) on simulated wheat yields. Stratified sampling was further compared with random sampling. Possible interactions between sample size and crop model were evaluated. The results showed differences in simulated yields among crop models but all models reproduced well the pattern of the stratification. Importantly, the regional mean of simulated yields based on full coverage could already be reproduced by a small sample of 10 points. This was also true for reproducing the temporal variability in simulated yields but more sampling points (about 100) were required to accurately reproduce spatial yield variability. The number of sampling points can be smaller when a stratified sampling is applied as compared to a random sampling. However, differences between crop models were observed including some interaction between the effect of sampling on simulated yields and the model used. We concluded that stratified sampling can considerably reduce the number of required simulations. But, differences between crop models must be considered as the choice for a specific model can have larger effects on simulated yields than the sampling strategy. Assessing the impact of sampling soil and crop management data for regional simulations of crop yields is still needed.
KW - Regional crop simulations
KW - Stratified sampling
KW - Upscaling
KW - Winter wheat
KW - Yield estimates
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84955063049
U2 - 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.01.014
DO - 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.01.014
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84955063049
SN - 0168-1923
VL - 220
SP - 101
EP - 115
JO - Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
JF - Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
ER -