Abstract
All-solid-state batteries (ASSB) are promising candidates for future energy storage. However, only a little is known about the manufacturing costs for industrial production. Herein, a detailed bottom-up calculation is performed to estimate the required investment and to facilitate comparison with conventional lithium-ion batteries (LIB). Results indicate that sulfide-based ASSBs can indeed be competitive if the material compatibility issues can be solved and production is successfully scaled. In contrast, oxide-based ASSBs will probably not be able to compete if cost is the decisive factor. A sensitivity analysis with Monte Carlo simulation reveals that the inert gas atmosphere required for sulfide-based ASSBs contributes little to the overall cell costs, whereas the sintering step for oxide-based ASSBs is highly critical. The calculation also indicates that in-house manufacturing of the lithium anode will be cheaper than purchasing the lithium foil externally if the cell producer has sufficient processing know-how. Finally, the aerosol deposition method is investigated, revealing that a deposition rate far above 1000 mm3 min−1 would be required to make the technology economically feasible in ASSB production. The results of this study will help researchers and industry prioritize development efforts and push the scale-up of future high-energy batteries with improved performance.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 1901237 |
| Journal | Energy Technology |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Mar 2020 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
Keywords
- all-solid-state batteries
- battery production
- cost analysis
- economic evaluation
- lithium-ion batteries
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Solid versus Liquid—A Bottom-Up Calculation Model to Analyze the Manufacturing Cost of Future High-Energy Batteries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver