Software product line testing: a systematic literature review

Halimeh Agh, Aidin Azamnouri, Stefan Wagner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A Software Product Line (SPL) is a software development paradigm in which a family of software products shares a set of core assets. Testing has a vital role in both single-system development and SPL development in identifying potential faults by examining the behavior of a product or products, but it is especially challenging in SPL. There have been many research contributions in the SPL testing field; therefore, assessing the current state of research and practice is necessary to understand the progress in testing practices and to identify the gap between required techniques and existing approaches. This paper aims to survey existing research on SPL testing to provide researchers and practitioners with up-to-date evidence and issues that enable further development of the field. To this end, we conducted a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) with seven research questions in which we identified and analyzed 118 studies dating from 2003 to 2022. The results indicate that the literature proposes many techniques for specific aspects (e.g., controlling cost/effort in SPL testing); however, other elements (e.g., regression testing and non-functional testing) still need to be covered by existing research. Furthermore, most approaches are evaluated by only one empirical method, most of which are academic evaluations. This may jeopardize the adoption of approaches in industry. The results of this study can help identify gaps in SPL testing since specific points of SPL Engineering still need to be addressed entirely.

Original languageEnglish
Article number146
JournalEmpirical Software Engineering
Volume29
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2024

Keywords

  • Software product lines
  • Software quality
  • Software testing
  • Systematic literature review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Software product line testing: a systematic literature review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this