Simulating Charged Defects in Silicon Dangling Bond Logic Systems to Evaluate Logic Robustness

Samuel S.H. Ng, Jeremiah Croshaw, Marcel Walter, Robert Wille, Robert Wolkow, Konrad Walus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Recent research interest in emerging logic systems based on quantum dots has been sparked by the experimental demonstration of nanometer-scale logic devices composed of atomically sized quantum dots made of silicon dangling bonds (SiDBs), along with the availability of SiQAD, a computer-aided design tool designed for this technology. Latest design automation frameworks have enabled the synthesis of SiDB circuits that reach the size of 32× 103, nm2 - orders of magnitude more complex than their hand-designed counterparts. However, current SiDB simulation engines do not take defects into account, which is important to consider for these sizable systems. This work proposes a formulation for incorporating fixed-charge simulation into established ground state models to cover an important class of defects that has a non-negligible effect on nearby SiDBs at the 10nm scale and beyond. The formulation is validated by implementing it into SiQAD's simulation engine and computationally reproducing experiments on multiple defect types, revealing a high level of accuracy. The new capability is applied towards studying the tolerance of several established logic gates against the introduction of a single nearby defect to establish the corresponding minimum required clearance. These findings are compared against existing metrics to form a foundation for logic robustness studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)231-237
Number of pages7
JournalIEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology
Volume23
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

Keywords

  • Computer aided design
  • defect simulation
  • defect tolerance
  • quantum dots
  • silicon dangling bonds
  • silicon quantum atomic designer (SiQAD)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Simulating Charged Defects in Silicon Dangling Bond Logic Systems to Evaluate Logic Robustness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this