TY - JOUR
T1 - Simulated low-dose multi-detector computed tomography
T2 - spatial effects on surrogate parameters of bone strength at the proximal femur
AU - Sollmann, Nico
AU - Mei, Kai
AU - Löffler, Maximilian T.
AU - Rühling, Sebastian
AU - Beer, Meinrad
AU - Zimmer, Claus
AU - Kirschke, Jan S.
AU - Noël, Peter B.
AU - Baum, Thomas
AU - Carballido-Gamio, Julio
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025/5
Y1 - 2025/5
N2 - Summary: This study investigated simulated tube current reduction and sparse sampling for low-dose computed tomography (CT) regarding volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and cortical bone thickness (Ct.Th) of the proximal femur. Sparse sampling with dose reductions of up to 90% may still allow extraction of bone strength parameters with clinically acceptable accuracy. Introduction: We aimed to investigate effects of CT with simulated lowered tube current and sparse sampling on trabecular and cortical vBMD as well as Ct.Th of the entire proximal femur, its subregions, and with detailed spatial assessments. Methods: Clinical routine multi-detector CT (MDCT) scans covering the hips from 40 patients were used for simulations of low-dose imaging with 50% and 10% of the original tube current (D50, D10) or projections (P50, P10) combined with statistical iterative reconstruction (SIR), which were then compared against original data with full dose (D100 P100) regarding trabecular vBMD, cortical vBMD, and Ct.Th. An automated framework for multi-parametric assessments was used. Relative errors by comparing measures from original data and simulated low-dose data, regression analyses, Bland–Altman analyses, and statistical parametric mapping (SPM, to assess the spatial distribution of accuracy) were computed. Results: Sparse sampling enabled drastic reductions of radiation exposure (down to 10% of original imaging) while still producing determinants of bone strength with clinically acceptable relative changes. Lower biases according to Bland–Altman analyses were observed for sparse sampling compared to imaging with virtually lowered tube currents (D10 P100 versus D100 P10) regarding trabecular vBMD, cortical vBMD, as well as Ct.Th. Better accuracy across the whole proximal femur for D100 P50 than for D50 P100 and for D100 P10 than for D10 P100 was observed. Conclusions: Sparse sampling with SIR may enable drastic reductions of radiation exposure (up to 90% of original doses) for opportunistically measuring image-based surrogate parameters of bone strength.
AB - Summary: This study investigated simulated tube current reduction and sparse sampling for low-dose computed tomography (CT) regarding volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and cortical bone thickness (Ct.Th) of the proximal femur. Sparse sampling with dose reductions of up to 90% may still allow extraction of bone strength parameters with clinically acceptable accuracy. Introduction: We aimed to investigate effects of CT with simulated lowered tube current and sparse sampling on trabecular and cortical vBMD as well as Ct.Th of the entire proximal femur, its subregions, and with detailed spatial assessments. Methods: Clinical routine multi-detector CT (MDCT) scans covering the hips from 40 patients were used for simulations of low-dose imaging with 50% and 10% of the original tube current (D50, D10) or projections (P50, P10) combined with statistical iterative reconstruction (SIR), which were then compared against original data with full dose (D100 P100) regarding trabecular vBMD, cortical vBMD, and Ct.Th. An automated framework for multi-parametric assessments was used. Relative errors by comparing measures from original data and simulated low-dose data, regression analyses, Bland–Altman analyses, and statistical parametric mapping (SPM, to assess the spatial distribution of accuracy) were computed. Results: Sparse sampling enabled drastic reductions of radiation exposure (down to 10% of original imaging) while still producing determinants of bone strength with clinically acceptable relative changes. Lower biases according to Bland–Altman analyses were observed for sparse sampling compared to imaging with virtually lowered tube currents (D10 P100 versus D100 P10) regarding trabecular vBMD, cortical vBMD, as well as Ct.Th. Better accuracy across the whole proximal femur for D100 P50 than for D50 P100 and for D100 P10 than for D10 P100 was observed. Conclusions: Sparse sampling with SIR may enable drastic reductions of radiation exposure (up to 90% of original doses) for opportunistically measuring image-based surrogate parameters of bone strength.
KW - Biomechanics
KW - Bone QCT/microCT
KW - Fracture risk assessment
KW - Osteoporosis
KW - Radiology
KW - Screening
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105001933684&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00198-025-07467-4
DO - 10.1007/s00198-025-07467-4
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105001933684
SN - 0937-941X
VL - 36
SP - 917
EP - 928
JO - Osteoporosis International
JF - Osteoporosis International
IS - 5
M1 - e38466
ER -