Serial MRI of limbic encephalitis

Horst Urbach, Bettina M. Soeder, Monika Jeub, Thomas Klockgether, Bernhard Meyer, Christian G. Bien

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

154 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the study was to analyze serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans in patients with various forms of limbic encephalitis (LE) in order to evaluate whether, and at what time point, MRI findings support the diagnosis of LE. Methods: Serial MRI scans (1 day to 15 years after the onset of symptoms) of 20 patients with LE were retrospectively evaluated. Of these 20 patients, 16 had definite LE (histopathological limbic inflammation, n=6; onconeural antibodies, n=5; voltage-gated potassium channel antibodies, n=3; malignant tumors, n=5), and 4 possible LE because they met the clinical criteria but had no typical antibodies or tumors. Results: Of 13 patients who were studied with MRI within 3 months after the onset of symptoms, 11 had swollen temporomesial structures (unilateral, n=7; bilateral, n=4). After up to 9 months, the swelling had resolved in nine of ten re-evaluated patients. Of seven patients who were initially studied with MRI more than 3 months after disease onset, three had swollen temporomesial structures, one had a hyperintense, normal-sized hippocampus, and three had hyperintense and atrophic temporomesial structures. Conclusion: LE starts as an acute disease with uni- or bilateral swollen temporomesial structures that are hyperintense on fluid attenuation inversion recovery and T2-weighted sequences. Swelling and hyperintensity may persist over months to years, but in most cases progressive temporomesial atrophy develops.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)380-386
Number of pages7
JournalNeuroradiology
Volume48
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Encephalitis
  • Hippocampus
  • Limbic
  • MRI

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Serial MRI of limbic encephalitis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this