TY - JOUR
T1 - Self-regulation, self-control, and management training transfer
AU - Kehr, Hugo M.
AU - Bles, Petra
AU - Von Rosenstiel, Lutz
N1 - Funding Information:
The research described in this paper was supported by a grant from the German Science Foundation (DFG). Portions of this paper were presented at the International Conference on Motivation, March 1998, Thessaloniki, Greece. The authors wish to thank Julius Kuhl and Marcus Brown for helpful comments on earlier versions of the paper.
PY - 1999
Y1 - 1999
N2 - Kuhl (1996, Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Serie Motivation und Emotion, Bd. 4, Motivation, Volition und Handlung (pp. 665-765). Göttingen: Hogrefe) differentiates between two modes of action control: self-regulation and self-control. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the relevance of self-regulation and self-control in management training transfer. Three hypotheses were derived from Kuhl's theory. The first is that self-regulators remember intentions better than self-controllers. The second is that self-regulation is associated with positive emotions, whereas self-control is associated with negative emotions. The final hypothesis is that self-regulation increases the success of training transfer, whereas self-control impedes the success of training transfer. To test these hypotheses, a longitudinal field study was conducted with 82 managers participating in two 2-day training sessions. Self-regulation and self-control were measured at the outset of the training session using the Volitional Components Inventory (VCI) (Kuhl & Fuhrmann, 1998, Lifespan perspectives an motivation and control (pp. 15-49). Hillsdale; NJ: Erlbaum). The dependent variables - intention memory, emotions, intention realization, and criteria fulfillment - were assessed three months after the course. The results corroborate Hypotheses 1 and 2; partial support was found for Hypothesis 3. Discussing these results, several suggestions for improving managers' self-regulation are proposed.
AB - Kuhl (1996, Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Serie Motivation und Emotion, Bd. 4, Motivation, Volition und Handlung (pp. 665-765). Göttingen: Hogrefe) differentiates between two modes of action control: self-regulation and self-control. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the relevance of self-regulation and self-control in management training transfer. Three hypotheses were derived from Kuhl's theory. The first is that self-regulators remember intentions better than self-controllers. The second is that self-regulation is associated with positive emotions, whereas self-control is associated with negative emotions. The final hypothesis is that self-regulation increases the success of training transfer, whereas self-control impedes the success of training transfer. To test these hypotheses, a longitudinal field study was conducted with 82 managers participating in two 2-day training sessions. Self-regulation and self-control were measured at the outset of the training session using the Volitional Components Inventory (VCI) (Kuhl & Fuhrmann, 1998, Lifespan perspectives an motivation and control (pp. 15-49). Hillsdale; NJ: Erlbaum). The dependent variables - intention memory, emotions, intention realization, and criteria fulfillment - were assessed three months after the course. The results corroborate Hypotheses 1 and 2; partial support was found for Hypothesis 3. Discussing these results, several suggestions for improving managers' self-regulation are proposed.
KW - Management training
KW - Self-control
KW - Self-regulation
KW - Training transfer
KW - Volition
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0010904792&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00017-8
DO - 10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00017-8
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0010904792
SN - 0883-0355
VL - 31
SP - 487
EP - 498
JO - International Journal of Educational Research
JF - International Journal of Educational Research
IS - 6
ER -