Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Urothelial Cancer with Paclitaxel and Everolimus in a German Phase II Trial (AUO Trial AB 35/09)

  • Günter Niegisch
  • , Margitta Retz
  • , Mark Thalgott
  • , Stefan Balabanov
  • , Friedemann Honecker
  • , Carsten Henning Ohlmann
  • , Michael Stöckle
  • , Martin Bögemann
  • , Frank Vom Dorp
  • , Jürgen Gschwend
  • , Arndt Hartmann
  • , Christian Ohmann
  • , Peter Albers
  • Heinrich-Heine-University
  • Technical University of Munich
  • Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
  • Saarland University
  • University of Münster
  • University of Duisburg-Essen
  • Universitätsklinikum Erlangen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: The efficacy of second-line treatment after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced urothelial cancer is limited. Based on encouraging preclinical and clinical phase I data, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of the combination of paclitaxel and everolimus in these patients. Methods: In this trial, patients having failed to respond to prior platinum-based combination treatment of urothelial cancer were treated with paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 i.v., 3-weekly) and the mTOR-inhibitor everolimus (10 mg p.o., once daily). The patients were treated until tumor progression or until a maximum of 6 cycles was completed. A one-stage design was used to evaluate the objective response rate (ORR) as the primary endpoint. Results: A total of 27 patients (67% male; median age 63 years) were enrolled. The most frequent grade III/IV toxicities were anemia (28%), peripheral neuropathy (28%), and fatigue (24%). No treatment-related deaths were reported. Complete and partial remissions were observed in 0/24 and 3/24 patients eligible for efficacy analysis, respectively (ORR 13%). Progression-free survival was 2.9 months [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.9-4.2], and the median overall survival was 5.6 months (95% CI 4.8-10.2). Conclusion: The combination of paclitaxel and everolimus has not achieved the expected efficacy in second-line treatment of urothelial cancer and should not be further explored.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)70-78
Number of pages9
JournalOncology
Volume89
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 22 Jul 2015

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Chemotherapy
  • Everolimus
  • Paclitaxel
  • Platinum failure
  • Urothelial cancer

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Urothelial Cancer with Paclitaxel and Everolimus in a German Phase II Trial (AUO Trial AB 35/09)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this