TY - JOUR
T1 - Savings
T2 - The policy debate in Europe
AU - Börsch-Supan, A.
AU - Brugiavini, A.
N1 - Funding Information:
1 This paper has profited greatly from comments by James Banks and two anonymous referees. We appreciate the financial support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Sonderforschungsbereich 504), by the EU (TMR Project, ‘Savings, Pensions and Portfolio Choice’), and by the Italian MURST (Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca Scientifica).
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - Three issues dominate the public policy debate over savings in Continental Europe. First, can private savings substitute for public pensions in the provision of retirement income, given that the current generosity of pay-as-you-go financed pensions is hardly sustainable in the light of population ageing? And if so, which policy steps have to be taken to alleviate this transition? Second, does the evolution of a 'new financial landscape' in Europe necessitate policy response in terms of taxation and regulation, specifically considering the increase in pension funds? And third, closely related to the other two issues, is there too much or too little saving in an ageing Europe? Will pension reform and the new financial landscape increase or decrease overall saving? Do we need to subsidize saving more or less than we currently do? The paper reviews economic theory and empirical evidence on these intertwined issues. Most importantly, it identifies many gaps in our theoretical and empirical knowledge that caution us against overly strong policy recommendations.
AB - Three issues dominate the public policy debate over savings in Continental Europe. First, can private savings substitute for public pensions in the provision of retirement income, given that the current generosity of pay-as-you-go financed pensions is hardly sustainable in the light of population ageing? And if so, which policy steps have to be taken to alleviate this transition? Second, does the evolution of a 'new financial landscape' in Europe necessitate policy response in terms of taxation and regulation, specifically considering the increase in pension funds? And third, closely related to the other two issues, is there too much or too little saving in an ageing Europe? Will pension reform and the new financial landscape increase or decrease overall saving? Do we need to subsidize saving more or less than we currently do? The paper reviews economic theory and empirical evidence on these intertwined issues. Most importantly, it identifies many gaps in our theoretical and empirical knowledge that caution us against overly strong policy recommendations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034984678&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/oxrep/17.1.116
DO - 10.1093/oxrep/17.1.116
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0034984678
SN - 0266-903X
VL - 17
SP - 116
EP - 143
JO - Oxford Review of Economic Policy
JF - Oxford Review of Economic Policy
IS - 1
ER -