TY - JOUR
T1 - Safety evaluation of the food enzyme glucan 1,4-α-maltotetraohydrolase from Bacillus licheniformis (strain DP-Dzr46)
AU - EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids (EFSA CEP Panel)
AU - Silano, Vittorio
AU - Barat Baviera, José Manuel
AU - Bolognesi, Claudia
AU - Brüschweiler, Beat Johannes
AU - Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro
AU - Crebelli, Riccardo
AU - Gott, David Michael
AU - Grob, Konrad
AU - Lampi, Evgenia
AU - Mortensen, Alicja
AU - Rivière, Gilles
AU - Steffensen, Inger Lise
AU - Tlustos, Christina
AU - Van Loveren, Henk
AU - Vernis, Laurence
AU - Zorn, Holger
AU - Glandorf, Boet
AU - Herman, Lieve
AU - Engel, Karl Heinz
AU - Kärenlampi, Sirpa
AU - Marcon, Francesca
AU - Penninks, André
AU - Aguilera, Jaime
AU - Aguilera-Gómez, Margarita
AU - Kovalkovicova, Natalia
AU - Liu, Yi
AU - Maia, Joaquim
AU - Rainieri, Sandra
AU - Chesson, Andrew
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.
PY - 2019/5
Y1 - 2019/5
N2 - The food enzyme glucan 1,4-α-maltotetraohydrolase (4-α-d-glucan maltotetraohydrolase, EC 3.2.1.60) is produced with a genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP-Dzr46 by Danisco US Inc. The genetic modifications do not give rise to safety concerns. The food enzyme is free from viable cells of the production organism and recombinant DNA. The glucan 1,4-α-maltotetraohydrolase food enzyme is intended to be used in baking processes. Based on the maximum use levels, dietary exposure to the food enzyme–Total Organic Solids (TOS) was estimated to be up to 0.405 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day in European populations. The toxicity studies were carried out with another glucan 1,4-α-maltotetraohydrolase from B. licheniformis (strain DP-Dzf24). The Panel considered this food enzyme as a suitable substitute to be used in the toxicological studies, because it derives from the same recipient strain as strain DP-Dzr46, the location of the inserts is comparable, no partial inserts were present and the production methods are comparable. Genotoxicity tests did not raise a safety concern. The systemic toxicity was assessed by means of a repeated dose 90-day oral toxicity study in rats. The Panel identified a no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) at the highest dose of 94 mg TOS/kg bw per day that, compared with the estimated dietary exposure, results in a sufficiently high margin of exposure of at least 232. Similarity of the amino acid sequence to those of known allergens was searched and none was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions by dietary exposure cannot be excluded, but the likelihood is considered to be low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use.
AB - The food enzyme glucan 1,4-α-maltotetraohydrolase (4-α-d-glucan maltotetraohydrolase, EC 3.2.1.60) is produced with a genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP-Dzr46 by Danisco US Inc. The genetic modifications do not give rise to safety concerns. The food enzyme is free from viable cells of the production organism and recombinant DNA. The glucan 1,4-α-maltotetraohydrolase food enzyme is intended to be used in baking processes. Based on the maximum use levels, dietary exposure to the food enzyme–Total Organic Solids (TOS) was estimated to be up to 0.405 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day in European populations. The toxicity studies were carried out with another glucan 1,4-α-maltotetraohydrolase from B. licheniformis (strain DP-Dzf24). The Panel considered this food enzyme as a suitable substitute to be used in the toxicological studies, because it derives from the same recipient strain as strain DP-Dzr46, the location of the inserts is comparable, no partial inserts were present and the production methods are comparable. Genotoxicity tests did not raise a safety concern. The systemic toxicity was assessed by means of a repeated dose 90-day oral toxicity study in rats. The Panel identified a no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) at the highest dose of 94 mg TOS/kg bw per day that, compared with the estimated dietary exposure, results in a sufficiently high margin of exposure of at least 232. Similarity of the amino acid sequence to those of known allergens was searched and none was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions by dietary exposure cannot be excluded, but the likelihood is considered to be low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use.
KW - 4-α-d-glucan maltotetraohydrolase
KW - 4-α-maltotetraohydrolase
KW - Bacillus licheniformis
KW - EC 3.2.1.60
KW - exo-maltotetraohydrolase
KW - food enzyme
KW - genetically modified microorganism
KW - glucan 1
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85066466798
U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5684
DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5684
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85066466798
SN - 1831-4732
VL - 17
JO - EFSA Journal
JF - EFSA Journal
IS - 5
M1 - e05684
ER -