TY - JOUR
T1 - Safety and feasibility of a 1 frame-per-second X-ray framerate in cardiac electrophysiology
AU - Deubner, Nikolas
AU - Ziakos, Athanasios
AU - Greiss, Harald
AU - Sezenias, Angelis
AU - Seyfarth, Melchior
AU - Sause, Armin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2021/3/1
Y1 - 2021/3/1
N2 - Background: We investigated the feasibility and safety of a framerate of 1 frame per second (“fps”) for fluoroscopy and cine-angiography, to lower radiation exposure for patients and personnel in cardiac electrophysiology (“EP”). Method: Analysis of 2521 EP procedures, 899 (36%) with the lowest available conventional framerate (3.75 fps) and 1622 (64%) procedures performed with a framerate lowered further to 1.0 fps (by looping a 1 Hz square pulse to the ECG trigger) performed between 01/2016 and 01/2020. Results: Procedures performed with 1.0 fps had the same acute procedural success rates (p = 0.20) and adverse event rates (p = 0.34) as the 3.75 fps group. There was no difference in total X-ray operation time (p = 0.40). The dose-area-product (DAP) was significantly reduced from 638 to 316 cGy*cm2 (p < < 0.0001) for all procedure types together, and for each subgroup. In a multivariable linear regression model, total X-ray operation time (estimate 38 cGy*cm2 /min) and body mass index (estimate 32 cGy*cm2 / index point) and a framerate of 1.0 fps (−314 cGy*cm2 against 3.75 fps) were independent predictors of a lower DAP (p-value of t-statistic for all << 0.0001). Conclusions: A framerate of 1.0 fps is safe and feasible in cardiac electrophysiology procedures. It was associated with a significant reduction of radiation exposure for patient and personnel.
AB - Background: We investigated the feasibility and safety of a framerate of 1 frame per second (“fps”) for fluoroscopy and cine-angiography, to lower radiation exposure for patients and personnel in cardiac electrophysiology (“EP”). Method: Analysis of 2521 EP procedures, 899 (36%) with the lowest available conventional framerate (3.75 fps) and 1622 (64%) procedures performed with a framerate lowered further to 1.0 fps (by looping a 1 Hz square pulse to the ECG trigger) performed between 01/2016 and 01/2020. Results: Procedures performed with 1.0 fps had the same acute procedural success rates (p = 0.20) and adverse event rates (p = 0.34) as the 3.75 fps group. There was no difference in total X-ray operation time (p = 0.40). The dose-area-product (DAP) was significantly reduced from 638 to 316 cGy*cm2 (p < < 0.0001) for all procedure types together, and for each subgroup. In a multivariable linear regression model, total X-ray operation time (estimate 38 cGy*cm2 /min) and body mass index (estimate 32 cGy*cm2 / index point) and a framerate of 1.0 fps (−314 cGy*cm2 against 3.75 fps) were independent predictors of a lower DAP (p-value of t-statistic for all << 0.0001). Conclusions: A framerate of 1.0 fps is safe and feasible in cardiac electrophysiology procedures. It was associated with a significant reduction of radiation exposure for patient and personnel.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85095568321&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.10.057
DO - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.10.057
M3 - Article
C2 - 33127415
AN - SCOPUS:85095568321
SN - 0167-5273
VL - 326
SP - 109
EP - 113
JO - International Journal of Cardiology
JF - International Journal of Cardiology
ER -