TY - JOUR
T1 - Robust Implicit EDF
T2 - A Wireless Mac Protocol for Collaborative Real-Time Systems
AU - Crenshaw, Tanya L.
AU - Hoke, Spencer
AU - Tirumala, Ajay
AU - Caccamo, Marco
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - Advances in wireless technology have brought us closer to extensive deployment of distributed realtime embedded systems connected through a wireless channel. The medium-access control (MAC) layer protocol is critical in providing a real-time guarantee. We have devised a real-time wireless MAC protocol, robust implicit earliest deadline first, or RI-EDF. Packets are transmitted according to EDF scheduling rules, offering a protocol that implicitly avoids contention. In the event of a packet loss or a node failure, every node has the opportunity to recover the schedule based on a static recovery priority, offering a protocol that is robust with no central point of failure. We demonstrate in simulations that RI-EDF provides better goodput and lower packet loss than existing protocols like 802.11 PCF and EDCF. In our implementation and distributed control test-bed, we show that RI-EDF provides better throughput than the TinyOS MAC-layer protocol. Overall, RI-EDF provides predictable temporal behavior with minimal impact on node failures, packet losses, and noise in the channel.
AB - Advances in wireless technology have brought us closer to extensive deployment of distributed realtime embedded systems connected through a wireless channel. The medium-access control (MAC) layer protocol is critical in providing a real-time guarantee. We have devised a real-time wireless MAC protocol, robust implicit earliest deadline first, or RI-EDF. Packets are transmitted according to EDF scheduling rules, offering a protocol that implicitly avoids contention. In the event of a packet loss or a node failure, every node has the opportunity to recover the schedule based on a static recovery priority, offering a protocol that is robust with no central point of failure. We demonstrate in simulations that RI-EDF provides better goodput and lower packet loss than existing protocols like 802.11 PCF and EDCF. In our implementation and distributed control test-bed, we show that RI-EDF provides better throughput than the TinyOS MAC-layer protocol. Overall, RI-EDF provides predictable temporal behavior with minimal impact on node failures, packet losses, and noise in the channel.
KW - Earliest deadline first
KW - Reliability
KW - medium-access control
KW - real time
KW - wireless
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924686247&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/1274858.1274866
DO - 10.1145/1274858.1274866
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84924686247
SN - 1539-9087
VL - 6
SP - 28
JO - ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems
JF - ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems
IS - 4
ER -