TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk stratification for postoperative pancreatic fistula using the pancreatic surgery registry StuDoQ|Pancreas of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery
AU - The StuDoQ|Pancreas study group and members of StuDoQ|Pancreas registry of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV)
AU - Petrova, Ekaterina
AU - Lapshyn, Hryhoriy
AU - Bausch, Dirk
AU - D'Haese, Jan
AU - Werner, Jens
AU - Klier, Thomas
AU - Nüssler, Natascha C.
AU - Gaedcke, Jochen
AU - Ghadimi, Michael
AU - Uhl, Waldemar
AU - Belyaev, Orlin
AU - Kantor, Olga
AU - Baker, Marshall
AU - Keck, Tobias
AU - Wellner, Ulrich F.
AU - Crones, Carsten
AU - Klammer, Frank
AU - Anthuber, Matthias
AU - Hommann, Merten
AU - Prenzel, Klaus
AU - Pratschke, Johann
AU - Lorenz, Eric P.M.
AU - Kalff, Jörg C.
AU - Tröbs, Ute
AU - Witzigmann, Helmut
AU - Krämling, Hans Jörg
AU - Stier, Albrecht
AU - Grützmann, Robert
AU - Niedergethmann, Marco
AU - Schwarzbach, Matthias
AU - Bechstein, Wolf Otto
AU - Kraus, Thomas
AU - Fichtner-Feigl, Stefan
AU - Kindler, Michael
AU - Manger, Thomas
AU - Padberg, Winfried
AU - Oldhafer, Karl Jürgen
AU - Chromik, Ansgar Michael
AU - Albayrak, Nurettin
AU - Glanemann, Matthias
AU - Mönch, Christian
AU - Reith, Hans Bernd
AU - Bruns, Christiane
AU - Kroesen, Anton J.
AU - Eisold, Sven
AU - Fleck, Ullrich
AU - Post, Stefan
AU - Bartsch, Detlef
AU - Gutt, Carsten
AU - Friess, Helmut
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018
PY - 2019/1
Y1 - 2019/1
N2 - Background: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a major factor for morbidity and mortality after pancreatic resection. Risk stratification for POPF is important for adjustment of treatment, selection of target groups in trials and quality assessment in pancreatic surgery. In this study, we built a risk-prediction model for POPF based on a large number of predictor variables from the German pancreatic surgery registry StuDoQ|Pancreas. Methods: StuDoQ|Pancreas was searched for patients, who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy from 2014 to 2016. A multivariable logistic regression model with elastic net regularization was built including 66 preoperative und intraoperative parameters. Cross-validation was used to select the optimal model. The model was assessed via area under the ROC curve (AUC) and calibration slope and intercept. Results: A total of N = 2488 patients were included. In the optimal model the predictors selected were texture of the pancreatic parenchyma (soft versus hard), body mass index, histological diagnosis pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and operation time. The AUC was 0.70 (95% CI 0.69–0.70), the calibration slope 1.67 and intercept 1.12. In the validation set the AUC was 0.65 (95% CI 0.64–0.66), calibration slope and intercept were 1.22 and 0.42, respectively. Conclusion: The model we present is a valid measurement instrument for POPF risk based on four predictor variables. It can be applied in clinical practice as well as for risk-adjustment in research studies and quality assurance in surgery.
AB - Background: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a major factor for morbidity and mortality after pancreatic resection. Risk stratification for POPF is important for adjustment of treatment, selection of target groups in trials and quality assessment in pancreatic surgery. In this study, we built a risk-prediction model for POPF based on a large number of predictor variables from the German pancreatic surgery registry StuDoQ|Pancreas. Methods: StuDoQ|Pancreas was searched for patients, who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy from 2014 to 2016. A multivariable logistic regression model with elastic net regularization was built including 66 preoperative und intraoperative parameters. Cross-validation was used to select the optimal model. The model was assessed via area under the ROC curve (AUC) and calibration slope and intercept. Results: A total of N = 2488 patients were included. In the optimal model the predictors selected were texture of the pancreatic parenchyma (soft versus hard), body mass index, histological diagnosis pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and operation time. The AUC was 0.70 (95% CI 0.69–0.70), the calibration slope 1.67 and intercept 1.12. In the validation set the AUC was 0.65 (95% CI 0.64–0.66), calibration slope and intercept were 1.22 and 0.42, respectively. Conclusion: The model we present is a valid measurement instrument for POPF risk based on four predictor variables. It can be applied in clinical practice as well as for risk-adjustment in research studies and quality assurance in surgery.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058532668&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.pan.2018.11.008
DO - 10.1016/j.pan.2018.11.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 30563791
AN - SCOPUS:85058532668
SN - 1424-3903
VL - 19
SP - 17
EP - 25
JO - Pancreatology
JF - Pancreatology
IS - 1
ER -