TY - JOUR
T1 - Revisiting the 1/N-strategy
T2 - a neural network framework for optimal strategies
AU - Escobar-Anel, Marcos
AU - Theilacker, Lorenz
AU - Zagst, Rudi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Associazione per la Matematica Applicata alle Scienze Economiche e Sociali (AMASES).
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - This work has two main objectives. First, we design a data-driven neural network approach to portfolio optimization within expected utility theory. The methodology is inspired by Li and Forsyth (Insur Math Econ 86:189–204, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2019.03.001), who worked on target based defined contribution plans. Our proposal and the architecture of the model is flexible enough to address a variety of specific portfolio problems, from standard optimal utility allocation with constraints, to optimal deviations from a benchmark. Using the celebrated 1/N-Strategy (see DeMiguel et al. in Rev Financ Stud 22(5):1915–1953, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm075) as benchmark constitutes the second objective of the paper. We consider two assets on a single path of historical return data for an investor whose utility is represented by a constant relative risk aversion function. Across several levels of risk aversion, we revisit the literature claims that it is essentially impossible to significantly outperform 1/N. Using our advanced method, we confirm that this is only true for high levels of risk aversion, but the 1/N can be consistently outperformed for low and moderate risk aversion levels.
AB - This work has two main objectives. First, we design a data-driven neural network approach to portfolio optimization within expected utility theory. The methodology is inspired by Li and Forsyth (Insur Math Econ 86:189–204, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2019.03.001), who worked on target based defined contribution plans. Our proposal and the architecture of the model is flexible enough to address a variety of specific portfolio problems, from standard optimal utility allocation with constraints, to optimal deviations from a benchmark. Using the celebrated 1/N-Strategy (see DeMiguel et al. in Rev Financ Stud 22(5):1915–1953, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm075) as benchmark constitutes the second objective of the paper. We consider two assets on a single path of historical return data for an investor whose utility is represented by a constant relative risk aversion function. Across several levels of risk aversion, we revisit the literature claims that it is essentially impossible to significantly outperform 1/N. Using our advanced method, we confirm that this is only true for high levels of risk aversion, but the 1/N can be consistently outperformed for low and moderate risk aversion levels.
KW - Dynamic portfolio optimization
KW - Expected utility theory
KW - Financial factors
KW - Neural network architecture
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85148864696&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10203-023-00388-z
DO - 10.1007/s10203-023-00388-z
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85148864696
SN - 1593-8883
VL - 46
SP - 505
EP - 542
JO - Decisions in Economics and Finance
JF - Decisions in Economics and Finance
IS - 2
ER -