Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Review of robotic systems for thoracoabdominal puncture interventional surgery

  • Cheng Wang
  • , Li Guo
  • , Jianjun Zhu
  • , Lifeng Zhu
  • , Chichi Li
  • , Haidong Zhu
  • , Aiguo Song
  • , Ligong Lu
  • , Gao Jun Teng
  • , Nassir Navab
  • , Zhongliang Jiang
  • Hanglok-Tech Co. Ltd.
  • School of Medicine, Southeast University
  • Southeast University
  • Macau University of Science and Technology
  • Guangzhou First People's Hospital
  • Zhuhai People's Hospital
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Technical University of Munich

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Cancer, with high morbidity and high mortality, is one of the major burdens threatening human health globally. Intervention procedures via percutaneous puncture have been widely used by physicians due to its minimally invasive surgical approach. However, traditional manual puncture intervention depends on personal experience and faces challenges in terms of precisely puncture, learning-curve, safety and efficacy. The development of puncture interventional surgery robotic (PISR) systems could alleviate the aforementioned problems to a certain extent. This paper attempts to review the current status and prospective of PISR systems for thoracic and abdominal application. In this review, the key technologies related to the robotics, including spatial registration, positioning navigation, puncture guidance feedback, respiratory motion compensation, and motion control, are discussed in detail.

Original languageEnglish
Article number021501
JournalAPL Bioengineering
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Review of robotic systems for thoracoabdominal puncture interventional surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this