Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Response Evaluation Criteria in PSMA PET/CT (RECIP 1.0) in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

  • Andrei Gafita
  • , Loïc Djaileb
  • , Isabel Rauscher
  • , Wolfgang P. Fendler
  • , Boris Hadaschik
  • , Steven P. Rowe
  • , Ken Herrmann
  • , Jeremie Calais
  • , Matthew Rettig
  • , Matthias Eiber
  • , Manuel Weber
  • , Matthias R. Benz
  • , Andrea Farolfi
  • David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
  • Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
  • University of Grenoble Alpes
  • Technical University of Munich
  • University Hospital of Essen
  • Pancreatic Research Group
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • University of Bologna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

84 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Response Evaluation Criteria in Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) PET/CT (RECIP 1.0) initially integrated software-based quantitative assessment of PSMA-positive total tumor volume (TTV). Clinical implementation of such software is not expected soon, limiting the use of RECIP in practice. Purpose: To assess the agreement of RECIP determined using tumor segmentation software (quantitative RECIP) with RECIP determined by qualitative reads by nuclear medicine physicians (visual RECIP) for response evaluation in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: This multicenter retrospective study at three academic centers included men who received lutetium 177 (177Lu) PSMA treatment between December 2014 and July 2019. PSMA PET/CT images at baseline and 12 weeks were assessed qualitatively by five readers for changes in TTV and for new lesions. Quantitative changes in TTV were also measured using tumor segmentation software. The status of new lesions was combined with qualitative changes in TTV to determine visual RECIP and with quantitative changes in TTV to determine quantitative RECIP. The primary outcomes were the agreement between visual and quantitative RECIP and the interreader reliability of visual RECIP according to the Fleiss κ. The secondary outcome was the association of visual RECIP with overall survival according to Cox regression. Results: A total of 124 men (median age, 73 years [IQR, 67–76 years]) were included. Forty (32%) and 84 (68%) men had quantitative RECIP progressive disease (PD) and non-PD, respectively. Agreement between visual versus quantitative RECIP was excellent (κ = 0.89; 118 of 124 men [95%]). Agreement among readers in classifying visual RECIP PD versus non-PD was excellent (κ = 0.81; 103 of 124 men [83%]). RECIP PD was associated with significantly shorter overall survival compared with non-PD (hazard ratio, 2.6 [95% CI: 1.7, 3.8]; P < .001). Conclusion: Qualitatively assessed RECIP demonstrated excellent agreement with quantitative RECIP and excellent interreader reliability and can be readily implemented in clinical practice for response evaluation in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer undergoing 177Lu-PSMA therapy.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere222148
JournalRadiology
Volume308
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Response Evaluation Criteria in PSMA PET/CT (RECIP 1.0) in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this