Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Residency program trainee-satisfaction correlate with results of the European board examination in neurosurgery

  • Martin N. Stienen
  • , David Netuka
  • , Andreas K. Demetriades
  • , Florian Ringel
  • , Oliver P. Gautschi
  • , Jens Gempt
  • , Dominique Kuhlen
  • , Karl Schaller
  • Geneva University Hospitals
  • Charles University
  • Western General Hospital
  • Technical University of Munich
  • University Medical Center
  • Civic Hospital of Lugano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: Substantial country differences in neurosurgical training throughout Europe have recently been described, ranging from subjective rating of training quality to objective working hours per week. The aim of this study was to analyse whether these differences translate into the results of the written and oral part of the European Board Examination in Neurological Surgery (EBE-NS). Methods: Country-specific composite scores for satisfaction with quality of theoretical and practical training, as well as working hours per week, were obtained from an electronic survey distributed among European neurosurgical residents between June 2014 and March 2015. These were related to anonymous country-specific results of the EBE-NS between 2009 and 2016, using uni- and multivariate linear regression analysis. Results: A total of n = 1025 written and n = 63 oral examination results were included. There was a significant linear relationship between the country-specific EBE-NS result in the written part and the country-specific composite score for satisfaction with quality of theoretical training [adjusted regression coefficient (RC) −3.80, 95 % confidence interval (CI) -5.43–7 -2.17, p < 0.001], but not with practical training or working time. For the oral part, there was a linear relationship between the country-specific EBE-NS result and the country-specific composite score for satisfaction with quality of practical training (RC 9.47, 95 % CI 1.47–17.47, p = 0.021), however neither with satisfaction with quality of theoretical training nor with working time. Conclusion: With every one-step improvement on the country-specific satisfaction score for theoretical training, the score in the EBE-NS Part 1 increased by 3.8 %. With every one-step improvement on the country-specific satisfaction score for practical training, the score in the EBE-NS Part 2 increased by 9.47 %. Improving training conditions is likely to have a direct positive influence on the knowledge level of trainees, as measured by the EBE-NS. The effect of the actual working time on the theoretical and practical knowledge of neurosurgical trainees appears to be insignificant.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1823-1830
Number of pages8
JournalActa Neurochirurgica
Volume158
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2016

Keywords

  • Board examination
  • Country difference
  • EANS
  • European Board Examination
  • Neurosurgery education
  • Quality
  • Residency
  • Residency
  • Trainee satisfaction
  • Training

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Residency program trainee-satisfaction correlate with results of the European board examination in neurosurgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this