TY - JOUR
T1 - Requirements for electronic laboratory reports according to the German guideline Rili-BAEK and ISO 15189
AU - Bietenbeck, Andreas
AU - Cadamuro, Janne
AU - Holdenrieder, Stefan
AU - Leichtle, Alexander Benedikt
AU - Ludwig, Amei
AU - Von Meyer, Alexander
AU - Nauck, Matthias
AU - Orth, Matthias
AU - Özçürümez, Mustafa
AU - Ponader, Alexander
AU - Streichert, Thomas
AU - Strobl, Dominik
AU - Tolios, Alexander
AU - Wiegel, Bernhard
AU - Gassner, Ulrich
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Andreas Bietenbeck et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston.
PY - 2021/10/1
Y1 - 2021/10/1
N2 - Objectives: Legal regulations and guidelines such as the Guidelines of the German Medical Association for the Quality Assurance of Laboratory Medical Examinations (Rili-BAEK) and ISO 15189 apply to electronic laboratory reports. However, many laboratories struggle with practical implementation of these regulations and guidelines. Methods: Laboratory and legal experts analyse the relevant guidelines and provide checklists and practical recommendations for implementation. Results: Laboratories have less control over the display of electronic laboratory reports than over paper documents. However, an electronic report alone is legally sufficient and need not be accompanied by a paper copy. Rili-BAEK and ISO 15189 stipulate a set of minimum information in every report. The laboratory must verify that reports are transmitted and displayed correctly. To help laboratories do so, agreements between laboratories and the report recipients can clarify responsibilities. Conclusions: Electronic laboratory reports can improve patient care, but laboratories need to verify their quality. Towards this end, Rili-BAEK and ISO 15189 set out helpful provisions.
AB - Objectives: Legal regulations and guidelines such as the Guidelines of the German Medical Association for the Quality Assurance of Laboratory Medical Examinations (Rili-BAEK) and ISO 15189 apply to electronic laboratory reports. However, many laboratories struggle with practical implementation of these regulations and guidelines. Methods: Laboratory and legal experts analyse the relevant guidelines and provide checklists and practical recommendations for implementation. Results: Laboratories have less control over the display of electronic laboratory reports than over paper documents. However, an electronic report alone is legally sufficient and need not be accompanied by a paper copy. Rili-BAEK and ISO 15189 stipulate a set of minimum information in every report. The laboratory must verify that reports are transmitted and displayed correctly. To help laboratories do so, agreements between laboratories and the report recipients can clarify responsibilities. Conclusions: Electronic laboratory reports can improve patient care, but laboratories need to verify their quality. Towards this end, Rili-BAEK and ISO 15189 set out helpful provisions.
KW - ISO 15189
KW - Rili-BAEK
KW - electronic laboratory report
KW - electronic patient record
KW - regulation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111680488&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1515/labmed-2020-0130
DO - 10.1515/labmed-2020-0130
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85111680488
SN - 2567-9430
VL - 45
SP - 197
EP - 203
JO - Journal of Laboratory Medicine
JF - Journal of Laboratory Medicine
IS - 4-5
ER -