Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Repeated kidney re-transplantation in times of organ shortage-a critical review

  • Technical University of Munich

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose of review Organ shortage forces those responsible to streamline allocation rules to provide a maximum of candidates with a graft and to optimize transplant outcome. Recently, repeated kidney re-transplantation was investigated in several studies with different analytic settings concerning the control group, the donors, parameters influencing outcome, and demographic characteristics. This review gives an overview on the candidates awaiting a repeated re-transplantation, summarizes the outcome, and comments on the relevance of these findings in the context of sustained organ shortage. Recent findings Repeated kidney re-transplantation is technically and immunologically feasible and the recipients' survival is better compared to candidates remaining on dialysis or on the waiting-list. However, the outcome is mainly reported to be worse as compared to first or second kidney transplantation. Kidneys from living donors seem to have a favorable impact on outcome in this setting. Summary The survival benefit of repeated re-transplantation recipients over patients on dialysis demands for continuation of this procedure. Comprehensive registries are essential to continuously optimize allocation. Governmental authorities are obliged to set the course to increase organ donation rather than forcing transplant decision makers to withhold a third or fourth graft from any candidate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)106-111
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent Opinion in Organ Transplantation
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2021

Keywords

  • Kidney transplantation
  • Multiple
  • Outcome
  • Re-transplantation
  • Repeated

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Repeated kidney re-transplantation in times of organ shortage-a critical review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this