Repeatability and reproducibility of macular hole size measurements using optical coherence tomography

Carmen Baumann, Ahmed Almarzooqi, Katharina Blobner, Daniel Zapp, Katharina Kirchmair, Lydia S. Schwer, Chris P. Lohmann, Stephen B. Kaye

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the repeatability and reproducibility of measuring the minimum linear diameter (MLD) of macular holes (MHs) using horizontal linear and radial scan modes in optical coherence tomography (OCT). Patients with concurrent sets of radial and horizontal linear OCT volume scans were included. The MLD was measured twice in both scan modes by six raters of three different experience levels (groups). Outcome measures were the reliability and repeatability of MLD measurements. Fifty patients were included. Mean MLD was 317.21(±170.63) µm in horizontal linear and 364.52 (±161.71) µm in radial mode, a difference of 47.31 (±26.48) µm (p < 0.001). In the radial scan mode, MLD was identified within 15 of the horizontal meridian in 27% and within 15 of the vertical meridian in 26.7%, with the remainder (46.3%) in oblique meridians. The intra-group coefficients of repeatability (CR) for horizontal linear mode were 23 µm, 33 µm and 45 µm, and for radial mode 25 µm, 44 µm and 57 µm for groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The inter-group CR, taking group 1 as reference standard for groups 2 and 3, were 74 µm and 71 µm for the linear mode, and 62 µm and 78 µm for radial mode. The radial mode provides good repeatability and reliability for measurement of MLD. In a majority of cases the MLD does not lie in the horizontal meridian and would be underestimated using a horizontal OCT mode.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2899
JournalJournal of Clinical Medicine
Volume10
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2021

Keywords

  • Macular hole
  • Minimum linear diameter
  • Optical coherence tomography
  • Scan pattern

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Repeatability and reproducibility of macular hole size measurements using optical coherence tomography'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this