Reliability of Semi-Automated Segmentations in Glioblastoma

T. Huber, G. Alber, S. Bette, T. Boeckh-Behrens, J. Gempt, F. Ringel, E. Alberts, C. Zimmer, J. S. Bauer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: In glioblastoma, quantitative volumetric measurements of contrast-enhancing or fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) hyperintense tumor compartments are needed for an objective assessment of therapy response. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of a semi-automated, region-growing segmentation tool for determining tumor volume in patients with glioblastoma among different users of the software. Methods: A total of 320 segmentations of tumor-associated FLAIR changes and contrast-enhancing tumor tissue were performed by different raters (neuroradiologists, medical students, and volunteers). All patients underwent high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging including a 3D-FLAIR and a 3D-MPRage sequence. Segmentations were done using a semi-automated, region-growing segmentation tool. Intra- and inter-rater-reliability were addressed by intra-class-correlation (ICC). Root-mean-square error (RMSE) was used to determine the precision error. Dice score was calculated to measure the overlap between segmentations. Results: Semi-automated segmentation showed a high ICC (> 0.985) for all groups indicating an excellent intra- and inter-rater-reliability. Significant smaller precision errors and higher Dice scores were observed for FLAIR segmentations compared with segmentations of contrast-enhancement. Single rater segmentations showed the lowest RMSE for FLAIR of 3.3 % (MPRage: 8.2 %). Both, single raters and neuroradiologists had the lowest precision error for longitudinal evaluation of FLAIR changes. Conclusions: Semi-automated volumetry of glioblastoma was reliably performed by all groups of raters, even without neuroradiologic expertise. Interestingly, segmentations of tumor-associated FLAIR changes were more reliable than segmentations of contrast enhancement. In longitudinal evaluations, an experienced rater can detect progressive FLAIR changes of less than 15 % reliably in a quantitative way which could help to detect progressive disease earlier.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)153-161
Number of pages9
JournalClinical Neuroradiology
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2017

Keywords

  • Brain tumor segmentation
  • Glioblastoma
  • Region-growing
  • Reliability
  • Semi-automated segmentation
  • Smartbrush

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability of Semi-Automated Segmentations in Glioblastoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this