Rejoinder

Daniel Schmidl; Claudia Czado; Sabine Hug; Fabian J. Theis

doi:10.1214/13-BA801REJ

Rejoinder

Daniel Schmidl, Claudia Czado, Sabine Hug, Fabian J. Theis

Technical University of Munich

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

First of all, we would like to thank both D. Woodard and M. Girolami & A. Mira for their excellent and detailed comments on our paper. Their remarks and questions have given us quite a number of new ideas for improving our sampling procedure. As suggested by both, we have conducted new sampling runs for two additional examples, which illustrate the usefulness of CIMH and ACIMH and answer some of the questions brought forward. Since Woodard's comments focus on one particular aspect of CIMH/ACIMH, while Girolami & Mira point out several different considerations, we will first reply to Woodard's comments.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	33-42
Number of pages	10
Journal	Bayesian Analysis
Volume	8
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1214/13-BA801REJ
State	Published - 2013

Access to Document

10.1214/13-BA801REJ

Cite this

@article{a20e87002dde41efbf475592653c1082,

title = "Rejoinder",

abstract = "First of all, we would like to thank both D. Woodard and M. Girolami \& A. Mira for their excellent and detailed comments on our paper. Their remarks and questions have given us quite a number of new ideas for improving our sampling procedure. As suggested by both, we have conducted new sampling runs for two additional examples, which illustrate the usefulness of CIMH and ACIMH and answer some of the questions brought forward. Since Woodard's comments focus on one particular aspect of CIMH/ACIMH, while Girolami \& Mira point out several different considerations, we will first reply to Woodard's comments.",

author = "Daniel Schmidl and Claudia Czado and Sabine Hug and Theis, \{Fabian J.\}",

year = "2013",

doi = "10.1214/13-BA801REJ",

language = "English",

volume = "8",

pages = "33--42",

journal = "Bayesian Analysis",

issn = "1936-0975",

publisher = "Carnegie Mellon University",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rejoinder

AU - Schmidl, Daniel

AU - Czado, Claudia

AU - Hug, Sabine

AU - Theis, Fabian J.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - First of all, we would like to thank both D. Woodard and M. Girolami & A. Mira for their excellent and detailed comments on our paper. Their remarks and questions have given us quite a number of new ideas for improving our sampling procedure. As suggested by both, we have conducted new sampling runs for two additional examples, which illustrate the usefulness of CIMH and ACIMH and answer some of the questions brought forward. Since Woodard's comments focus on one particular aspect of CIMH/ACIMH, while Girolami & Mira point out several different considerations, we will first reply to Woodard's comments.

AB - First of all, we would like to thank both D. Woodard and M. Girolami & A. Mira for their excellent and detailed comments on our paper. Their remarks and questions have given us quite a number of new ideas for improving our sampling procedure. As suggested by both, we have conducted new sampling runs for two additional examples, which illustrate the usefulness of CIMH and ACIMH and answer some of the questions brought forward. Since Woodard's comments focus on one particular aspect of CIMH/ACIMH, while Girolami & Mira point out several different considerations, we will first reply to Woodard's comments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875106640&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1214/13-BA801REJ

DO - 10.1214/13-BA801REJ

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84875106640

SN - 1936-0975

VL - 8

SP - 33

EP - 42

JO - Bayesian Analysis

JF - Bayesian Analysis

IS - 1

ER -

Rejoinder

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this