Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: A clinical comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone single bundle versus semitendinosus and gracilis double bundle technique

Patrick Sadoghi, Peter E. Müller, Volkmar Jansson, Martin Van Griensven, Albert Kröpfl, Martin F. Fischmeister

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

The study hypothesis was that the outcome of semitendinosus gracilis double bundle (STG-DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is advantageous in terms of clinical results and restoration of anterior-posterior and rotational laxity in comparison to bone-patellar tendon-bone single-bundle (PTB-SB) ACL reconstruction. We analysed 41 PTB-SB and 51 STG-DB patients using the Tegner, IKDC and WOMAC scores preoperatively and at a minimum follow-up of two years. At follow-up, there was no significant difference in the clinical scores. The KT 1000 side-to-side measurement showed no significant difference between groups. The STG-DB group was significantly superior in terms of the pivot-shift sign and anterior knee pain. We conclude that the outcome of STG-DB reconstruction in the mid-term was not advantageous in terms of clinical scores and anterior-posterior laxity evaluated by the KT 1000. Nevertheless, the restored rotational laxity measured by the pivot shift test was significantly superior in the STG-DB technique.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)127-133
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Orthopaedics
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: A clinical comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone single bundle versus semitendinosus and gracilis double bundle technique'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this