TY - JOUR
T1 - Reconstructing the lensing mass in the Universe from photometric catalogue data
AU - Collett, Thomas E.
AU - Marshall, Philip J.
AU - Auger, Matthew W.
AU - Hilbert, Stefan
AU - Suyu, Sherry H.
AU - Greene, Zachary
AU - Treu, Tommaso
AU - Fassnacht, Christopher D.
AU - Koopmans, Léon V.E.
AU - Bradač, Maruša
AU - Blandford, Roger D.
PY - 2013/6
Y1 - 2013/6
N2 - High precision cosmological distance measurements towards individual objects such as time delay gravitational lenses or Type Ia supernovae are affected by weak lensing perturbations by galaxies and groups along the line of sight. In time delay gravitational lenses, 'external convergence', κext, can dominate the uncertainty in the inferred distances and hence cosmological parameters. In this paper we attempt to reconstruct κext, due to line of sight structure, using a simple halo model. We use mock catalogues from the Millennium Simulation, and calibrate and compare our reconstructed P(κext) to ray-traced κext 'truth' values; taking into account realistic uncertainties on redshift and stellar masses. We find that the reconstruction of κext provides an improvement in precision of ~50 per cent over galaxy number counts. We find that the lowest κext lines of sight have the best constrained P(κext). In anticipation of future samples with thousands of lenses, we find that selecting the third of the systems with the highest precision κext estimates gives a subsample of unbiased time delay distance measurements with (on average) just 1 per cent uncertainty due to line of sight external convergence effects. Photometric data alone are sufficient to pre-select the best-constrained lines of sight, and can be done before investment in light-curve monitoring. Conversely, we show that selecting lines of sight with high external shear could, with the reconstruction model presented here, induce biases of up to 1 per cent in time delay distance. We find that a major potential source of systematic error is uncertainty in the high-mass end of the stellar mass-halo mass relation; this could introduce ~2 per cent biases on the time delay distance if completely ignored. We suggest areas for the improvement of this general analysis framework (including more sophisticated treatment of high-mass structures) that should allow yet more accurate cosmological inferences to be made.
AB - High precision cosmological distance measurements towards individual objects such as time delay gravitational lenses or Type Ia supernovae are affected by weak lensing perturbations by galaxies and groups along the line of sight. In time delay gravitational lenses, 'external convergence', κext, can dominate the uncertainty in the inferred distances and hence cosmological parameters. In this paper we attempt to reconstruct κext, due to line of sight structure, using a simple halo model. We use mock catalogues from the Millennium Simulation, and calibrate and compare our reconstructed P(κext) to ray-traced κext 'truth' values; taking into account realistic uncertainties on redshift and stellar masses. We find that the reconstruction of κext provides an improvement in precision of ~50 per cent over galaxy number counts. We find that the lowest κext lines of sight have the best constrained P(κext). In anticipation of future samples with thousands of lenses, we find that selecting the third of the systems with the highest precision κext estimates gives a subsample of unbiased time delay distance measurements with (on average) just 1 per cent uncertainty due to line of sight external convergence effects. Photometric data alone are sufficient to pre-select the best-constrained lines of sight, and can be done before investment in light-curve monitoring. Conversely, we show that selecting lines of sight with high external shear could, with the reconstruction model presented here, induce biases of up to 1 per cent in time delay distance. We find that a major potential source of systematic error is uncertainty in the high-mass end of the stellar mass-halo mass relation; this could introduce ~2 per cent biases on the time delay distance if completely ignored. We suggest areas for the improvement of this general analysis framework (including more sophisticated treatment of high-mass structures) that should allow yet more accurate cosmological inferences to be made.
KW - Cosmology: observations
KW - Galaxies: haloes
KW - Galaxies: luminosity function, mass function
KW - Gravitational lensing: weak
KW - Methods: statistical
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878476603&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/mnras/stt504
DO - 10.1093/mnras/stt504
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84878476603
SN - 0035-8711
VL - 432
SP - 679
EP - 692
JO - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
JF - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
IS - 1
ER -