Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of sunitinib plus prednisone versus prednisone alone in progressive, metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer

  • M. Dror Michaelson
  • , Stephane Oudard
  • , Nadine Houede
  • , Tristan Maurina
  • , Yen Chuan Ou
  • , Lisa Sengeløv
  • , Gedske Daugaard
  • , Fred Saad
  • , Peter Ostler
  • , Robert Jones
  • , Amit Bahl
  • , Arnulf Stenzl
  • , Juergen Gschwend
  • , Fredrik Laestadius
  • , Anders Ullèn
  • , Daniel Castellano
  • , Edna Chow Maneval
  • , Shaw Ling Wang
  • , Isan Chen
  • , Maria Jose Lechuga
  • Jolanda Paolini
  • Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
  • AP-HP
  • Institut Bergonié
  • Hopital Jean Minjoz
  • Department of Medical Research
  • Gentofte Hospital
  • Rigshospitalet
  • Université de Montréal
  • Mount Vernon Hospital
  • Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre
  • Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre
  • University of Tübingen
  • Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital
  • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
  • Pfizer Inc.
  • Pfizer Oncology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

150 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: We evaluated angiogenesis-targeted sunitinib therapy in a randomized, double-blind trial of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Patients and Methods: Men with progressive mCRPC after docetaxel-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive sunitinib 37.5 mg/d continuously or placebo. Patients also received oral prednisone 5 mg twice daily. The primary end point was overall survival (OS); secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS). Two interim analyses were planned. Results: Overall, 873 patients were randomly assigned to receive sunitinib (n = 584) or placebo (n = 289). The independent data monitoring committee stopped the study for futility after the second interim analysis. After a median overall follow-up of 8.7 months, median OS was 13.1 months and 11.8 months for sunitinib and placebo, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.914; 95% CI, 0.762 to 1.097; stratified log-rank test, P = .168). PFS was significantly improved in the sunitinib arm (median 5.6 v 4.1 months; HR, 0.725; 95% CI, 0.591 to 0.890; stratified log-rank test, P < .001). Toxicity and rates of discontinuations because of adverse events (AEs; 27% v 7%) were greater with sunitinib than placebo. The most common treatment-related grade 3/4 AEs were fatigue (9% v 1%), asthenia (8% v 2%), and hand-foot syndrome (7% v 0%). Frequent treatment-emergent grade 3/4 hematologic abnormalities were lymphopenia (20% v 11%), anemia (9% v 8%), and neutropenia (6% v < 1%). Conclusion: The addition of sunitinib to prednisone did not improve OS compared with placebo in docetaxel-refractory mCRPC. The role of antiangiogenic therapy in mCRPC remains investigational.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)76-82
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 10 Jan 2014

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of sunitinib plus prednisone versus prednisone alone in progressive, metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this