TY - JOUR
T1 - Randomized phase II trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without lonafarnib in first-line treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer stage IIB-IV
AU - Meier, Werner
AU - Du Bois, Andreas
AU - Rau, Jörn
AU - Gropp-Meier, Martina
AU - Baumann, Klaus
AU - Huober, Jens
AU - Wollschlaeger, Kerstin
AU - Kreienberg, Rolf
AU - Canzler, Ulrich
AU - Schmalfeldt, Barbara
AU - Wimberger, Pauline
AU - Richter, Barbara
AU - Schröder, Willibald
AU - Belau, Antje
AU - Stähle, Anne
AU - Burges, Alexander
AU - Sehouli, Jalid
N1 - Funding Information:
The AGO study group received financial support for clinical studies by Schering Plough. Andreas du Bois received honoraria for educational lecturing by Schering Plough, former manufacturer of lonafarnib. However, this company does not exist anymore. In addition, he received honorarium for advisory board activities. Werner Meier, Jörn Rau, Martina Gropp-Meier, Klaus Baumann, Jens Huober, Kerstin Wollschlaeger, Christian Kurzeder, Ulrich Canzler, Barbara Schmalfeldt, Pauline Wimberger, Barbara Richter, Willibald Schröder, Antje Belau, Anne Stähle, Alexander Burges, Jalid Sehouli, declare no conflict of interest.
PY - 2012/8
Y1 - 2012/8
N2 - Objectives: This study evaluates whether a molecular targeted therapy with the farnesyltransferase inhibitor lonafarnib added to standard chemotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer (OC) could improve progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients and Methods: We performed a prospective randomized phase II study to compare standard therapy carboplatin (C; AUC 5) and paclitaxel (T; 175 mg/m 2) in primary advanced OC with or without lonafarnib (L). Lonafarnib was given in a dose of 100 mg orally twice a day during chemotherapy and was increased afterwards to 200 mg up to six months as a maintenance therapy. Results: 105 patients were recruited (53 patients were randomized to receive LTC, 52 to TC). Hematologic toxicity was similar in both arms. Grade 3 and 4 non-hematological toxicity, occurred significantly more often with LTC (23% versus 4%, p = 0.005) and was associated with a higher dropout rate. PFS and OS were not significantly different among both arms. The LTC arm showed inferiority in the stratum with residual tumor of more than 1 cm: median PFS was 11.5 months (95% CI: 7.4-14.2) compared with 16.4 (95% CI: 10.3-40.4) for TC (p = 0.0141; HR = 0.36 (95% CI: 0.15-0.84)) with median OS 20.6 months (95% CI: 13.1-31.0) and 43.4 months (95% CI: 15.7-) for the TC arm (p = 0.012; HR = 0.32 (95% CI: 0.13-0.8)). Conclusion: The addition of lonafarnib did not improve PFS or OS. Patients with a residual tumor of more than 1 cm had significantly shorter PFS and OS. Incorporation of lonafarnib into future studies for primary therapy of OC is not recommended.
AB - Objectives: This study evaluates whether a molecular targeted therapy with the farnesyltransferase inhibitor lonafarnib added to standard chemotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer (OC) could improve progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients and Methods: We performed a prospective randomized phase II study to compare standard therapy carboplatin (C; AUC 5) and paclitaxel (T; 175 mg/m 2) in primary advanced OC with or without lonafarnib (L). Lonafarnib was given in a dose of 100 mg orally twice a day during chemotherapy and was increased afterwards to 200 mg up to six months as a maintenance therapy. Results: 105 patients were recruited (53 patients were randomized to receive LTC, 52 to TC). Hematologic toxicity was similar in both arms. Grade 3 and 4 non-hematological toxicity, occurred significantly more often with LTC (23% versus 4%, p = 0.005) and was associated with a higher dropout rate. PFS and OS were not significantly different among both arms. The LTC arm showed inferiority in the stratum with residual tumor of more than 1 cm: median PFS was 11.5 months (95% CI: 7.4-14.2) compared with 16.4 (95% CI: 10.3-40.4) for TC (p = 0.0141; HR = 0.36 (95% CI: 0.15-0.84)) with median OS 20.6 months (95% CI: 13.1-31.0) and 43.4 months (95% CI: 15.7-) for the TC arm (p = 0.012; HR = 0.32 (95% CI: 0.13-0.8)). Conclusion: The addition of lonafarnib did not improve PFS or OS. Patients with a residual tumor of more than 1 cm had significantly shorter PFS and OS. Incorporation of lonafarnib into future studies for primary therapy of OC is not recommended.
KW - Farnesytransferase inhibition
KW - Firstline treatment
KW - Lonafarnib
KW - Ovarian cancer
KW - Phase II trial
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862840384&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.04.050
DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.04.050
M3 - Article
C2 - 22564713
AN - SCOPUS:84862840384
SN - 0090-8258
VL - 126
SP - 236
EP - 240
JO - Gynecologic Oncology
JF - Gynecologic Oncology
IS - 2
ER -