TY - GEN
T1 - Railway bonus and aircraft malus for different directions of the sound source?
AU - Fastl, Hugo
AU - Kuwano, Sonoko
AU - Namba, Seiichiro
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - Even for same LAeq, noise immissions from different types of traffic noise elicit not always the same loudness and annoyance. Frequently, railway noise is perceived as less annoying than road traffic noise (railway bonus), whereas aircraft noise can be perceived as more annoying than road traffic noise (aircraft malus). As one possible reason for the aircraft malus - in addition to differences in spectral distribution and temporal structure - sometimes the hypothesis is put forward that sounds which come from above a person are perceived as particularly dangerous and annoying. In order to challenge this hypothesis, psychoacoustic experiments were performed in which the same immissions of equal LAeq from railway noise, road traffic noise, and aircraft noise were presented by loudspeakers in front of versus above the subjects. They had to rate the overall loudness of the noise immissions by category scaling, magnitude estimation, and line length. Results are presented in which the magnitude of bonus or malus is given as a function of the direction of the sound sources. For presentation in front of the subjects, both railway bonus and aircraft malus were found. However, for "natural" situations like road traffic noise from front and aircraft noise from above, no aircraft malus showed up.
AB - Even for same LAeq, noise immissions from different types of traffic noise elicit not always the same loudness and annoyance. Frequently, railway noise is perceived as less annoying than road traffic noise (railway bonus), whereas aircraft noise can be perceived as more annoying than road traffic noise (aircraft malus). As one possible reason for the aircraft malus - in addition to differences in spectral distribution and temporal structure - sometimes the hypothesis is put forward that sounds which come from above a person are perceived as particularly dangerous and annoying. In order to challenge this hypothesis, psychoacoustic experiments were performed in which the same immissions of equal LAeq from railway noise, road traffic noise, and aircraft noise were presented by loudspeakers in front of versus above the subjects. They had to rate the overall loudness of the noise immissions by category scaling, magnitude estimation, and line length. Results are presented in which the magnitude of bonus or malus is given as a function of the direction of the sound sources. For presentation in front of the subjects, both railway bonus and aircraft malus were found. However, for "natural" situations like road traffic noise from front and aircraft noise from above, no aircraft malus showed up.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84873880928
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84873880928
SN - 9781622763399
T3 - International Congress on Noise Control Engineering 2005, INTERNOISE 2005
SP - 837
EP - 842
BT - International Congress on Noise Control Engineering 2005, INTERNOISE 2005
T2 - 34th International Congress on Noise Control Engineering 2005, INTERNOISE 2005
Y2 - 7 August 2005 through 10 August 2005
ER -