TY - JOUR
T1 - Radiosurgery Society Case-Based Guide to Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Challenging Cases of Spinal Metastases
AU - Aziz, Khaled
AU - Koffler, Daniel
AU - Vassantachart, April
AU - Rattani, Abbas
AU - Ankrah, Nii Kwanchie
AU - Gogineni, Emile
AU - Andraos, Therese Y.
AU - Sahgal, Arjun
AU - Vellayappan, Balamurugan
AU - Dunne, Emma M.
AU - Siva, Shankar
AU - Moraes, Fabio Y.
AU - Guckenberger, Matthias
AU - Lubelski, Daniel
AU - Chao, Samuel
AU - Combs, Stephanie
AU - Chang, Eric
AU - Amin, Anubhav G.
AU - Foote, Matthew
AU - Gibbs, Iris
AU - Kim, Minsun
AU - Palmer, Joshua
AU - Lo, Simon
AU - Redmond, Kristin J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Society for Radiation Oncology
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - Purpose: Spinal stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has become the standard of care in management of patients with limited sites of metastatic disease, radioresistant histologies, painful vertebral metastases with long life expectancy and cases of reirradiation. Our case-based guidelines aim to assist radiation oncologists in the appropriate utilization of SBRT for common, yet challenging, cases of spinal metastases. Methods and Materials: Cases were selected to include scenarios of large volume sacral disease with nerve entrapment, medically inoperable disease abutting the thecal sac, and local failure after prior SBRT. Relevant literature was reviewed, and areas requiring further investigation were discussed to offer a framework for evidence-based clinical practice. Results: Spinal SBRT can be effectively delivered in challenging cases following multidisciplinary discussion by using a methodical approach to patient selection, appropriate dose selection, and adherence to evidence-based dose constraints. Conclusions: The Radiosurgery Society's case-based practice review offers guidance to practicing physicians treating technically challenging SBRT candidate patients with spinal metastases.
AB - Purpose: Spinal stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has become the standard of care in management of patients with limited sites of metastatic disease, radioresistant histologies, painful vertebral metastases with long life expectancy and cases of reirradiation. Our case-based guidelines aim to assist radiation oncologists in the appropriate utilization of SBRT for common, yet challenging, cases of spinal metastases. Methods and Materials: Cases were selected to include scenarios of large volume sacral disease with nerve entrapment, medically inoperable disease abutting the thecal sac, and local failure after prior SBRT. Relevant literature was reviewed, and areas requiring further investigation were discussed to offer a framework for evidence-based clinical practice. Results: Spinal SBRT can be effectively delivered in challenging cases following multidisciplinary discussion by using a methodical approach to patient selection, appropriate dose selection, and adherence to evidence-based dose constraints. Conclusions: The Radiosurgery Society's case-based practice review offers guidance to practicing physicians treating technically challenging SBRT candidate patients with spinal metastases.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85205666936&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.prro.2024.08.004
DO - 10.1016/j.prro.2024.08.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 39233007
AN - SCOPUS:85205666936
SN - 1879-8500
VL - 15
SP - 54
EP - 68
JO - Practical Radiation Oncology
JF - Practical Radiation Oncology
IS - 1
ER -