Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Questions and Controversies in the Clinical Application of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors to Treat Patients with Radioiodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: Expert Perspectives

  • Frederik A. Verburg
  • , Holger Amthauer
  • , Ina Binse
  • , Ingo Brink
  • , Andreas Buck
  • , Andreas Darr
  • , Christine Dierks
  • , Christine Koch
  • , Ute König
  • , Michael C. Kreissl
  • , Markus Luster
  • , Christoph Reuter
  • , Klemens Scheidhauer
  • , Holger Sven Willenberg
  • , Andreas Zielke
  • , Matthias Schott
  • Somnomar Institut für Medizinische Forschung und Schlafmedizin
  • Erasmus University Medical Center
  • Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin
  • University Hospital of Essen
  • Ernst von Bergmann Hospital
  • University Hospital Würzburg
  • University Heart Center
  • University of Freiburg
  • Klinikum der J. W. Goethe-Universität
  • Georg August Universität Göttingen
  • Otto-von-Guericke University
  • Hannover Medical School
  • University of Rostock
  • Diakonie-Klinikum Stuttgart
  • Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Notwithstanding regulatory approval of lenvatinib and sorafenib to treat radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid carcinoma (RAI-R DTC), important questions and controversies persist regarding this use of these tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). RAI-R DTC experts from German tertiary referral centers convened to identify and explore such issues; this paper summarizes their discussions. One challenge is determining when to start TKI therapy. Decision-making should be shared between patients and multidisciplinary caregivers, and should consider tumor size/burden, growth rate, and site(s), the key drivers of RAI-R DTC morbidity and mortality, along with current and projected tumor-related symptomatology, co-morbidities, and performance status. Another question involves choice of first-line TKIs. Currently, lenvatinib is generally preferred, due to greater increase in progression-free survival versus placebo treatment and higher response rate in its pivotal trial versus that of sorafenib; additionally, in those studies, lenvatinib but not sorafenib showed overall survival benefit in subgroup analysis. Whether recommended maximum or lower TKI starting doses better balance anti-tumor effects versus tolerability is also unresolved. Exploratory analyses of lenvatinib pivotal study data suggest dose-response effects, possibly favoring higher dosing; however, results are awaited of a prospective comparison of lenvatinib starting regimens. Some controversy surrounds determination of net therapeutic benefit, the key criterion for continuing TKI therapy: if tolerability is acceptable, overall disease control may justify further treatment despite limited but manageable progression. Future research should assess potential guideposts for starting TKIs; fine-tune dosing strategies and further characterize antitumor efficacy; and evaluate interventions to prevent and/or treat TKI toxicity, particularly palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia and fatigue.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)149-160
Number of pages12
JournalHormone and Metabolic Research
Volume53
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2 Mar 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • dosing
  • lenvatinib
  • multi-kinase inhibitors
  • second-line therapy
  • sorafenib
  • treatment initiation and discontinuation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Questions and Controversies in the Clinical Application of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors to Treat Patients with Radioiodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: Expert Perspectives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this