TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantitative analysis of thin metal powder layers via transmission X-ray imaging and discrete element simulation
T2 - Blade-based spreading approaches
AU - Penny, Ryan W.
AU - Oropeza, Daniel
AU - Praegla, Patrick M.
AU - Weissbach, Reimar
AU - Meier, Christoph
AU - Wall, Wolfgang A.
AU - John Hart, A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2024/1/2
Y1 - 2024/1/2
N2 - Spreading uniform and dense layers is of paramount importance to creating high-quality components using powder bed fusion additive manufacturing (PBF AM). Blade-like tools are often employed for spreading powder metal feedstocks, especially in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) and electron beam melting (EBM), where powders are characterized by a D50V of 30 μm or greater. Along with variations in boundary conditions introduced by the layer-wise geometry and surface topography of the printed component, stochastic interactions between the spreading tool and powder result in spatial variations of layer quality that are still not well understood. Here, to study powder spreading under conditions representative of PBF AM, we employ a modular, mechanized apparatus to create powder layers from moderately and highly cohesive powders (nominally 15–45μm Ti–6Al–4V and 20–63μm Al–10Si–Mg, respectively) with a selection of blade-like spreading tools. Powder layer effective depth is spatially mapped using transmission X-ray imaging, and uniformity is quantified via a statistical approach. We first compare layer density, or the effective depth of powder layer, and show that blade geometries with a curved profile lead to increased material deposition. Second, this approach enables quantification of local fluctuations, or layer defect severity. For example, we observe that the primary benefit of a V-shaped rubber (compliant) blade, as compared to a 45° rigid blade, lies in enabling local deflection of the blade edge to eliminate streaking from large particles, while also increasing deposition (layer density). Additionally, we employ a custom DEM simulation to elucidate the opposing roles of particle density and surface energy with a pseudo-material approach, where the balance of inertial and cohesive forces determine macro-scale powder flowability. For each alloy density, selected to represent Ti–6Al–4V and Al–10Si–Mg, we find via simulations a critical surface energy beyond which layer density is greatly impaired when powder spreading is performed using a blade.
AB - Spreading uniform and dense layers is of paramount importance to creating high-quality components using powder bed fusion additive manufacturing (PBF AM). Blade-like tools are often employed for spreading powder metal feedstocks, especially in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) and electron beam melting (EBM), where powders are characterized by a D50V of 30 μm or greater. Along with variations in boundary conditions introduced by the layer-wise geometry and surface topography of the printed component, stochastic interactions between the spreading tool and powder result in spatial variations of layer quality that are still not well understood. Here, to study powder spreading under conditions representative of PBF AM, we employ a modular, mechanized apparatus to create powder layers from moderately and highly cohesive powders (nominally 15–45μm Ti–6Al–4V and 20–63μm Al–10Si–Mg, respectively) with a selection of blade-like spreading tools. Powder layer effective depth is spatially mapped using transmission X-ray imaging, and uniformity is quantified via a statistical approach. We first compare layer density, or the effective depth of powder layer, and show that blade geometries with a curved profile lead to increased material deposition. Second, this approach enables quantification of local fluctuations, or layer defect severity. For example, we observe that the primary benefit of a V-shaped rubber (compliant) blade, as compared to a 45° rigid blade, lies in enabling local deflection of the blade edge to eliminate streaking from large particles, while also increasing deposition (layer density). Additionally, we employ a custom DEM simulation to elucidate the opposing roles of particle density and surface energy with a pseudo-material approach, where the balance of inertial and cohesive forces determine macro-scale powder flowability. For each alloy density, selected to represent Ti–6Al–4V and Al–10Si–Mg, we find via simulations a critical surface energy beyond which layer density is greatly impaired when powder spreading is performed using a blade.
KW - Additive manufacturing
KW - Discrete element method
KW - Packing density
KW - Powder flow
KW - Powder spreading
KW - X-ray
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85177174193&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.powtec.2023.119106
DO - 10.1016/j.powtec.2023.119106
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85177174193
SN - 0032-5910
VL - 432
JO - Powder Technology
JF - Powder Technology
M1 - 119106
ER -