TY - JOUR
T1 - QTc evaluation in patients with bundle branch block
AU - Bogossian, Harilaos
AU - Linz, Dominik
AU - Heijman, Jordi
AU - Bimpong-Buta, Nana Yaw
AU - Bandorski, Dirk
AU - Frommeyer, Gerrit
AU - Erkapic, Damir
AU - Seyfarth, Melchior
AU - Zarse, Markus
AU - Crijns, Harry J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s)
PY - 2020/10
Y1 - 2020/10
N2 - Proper measurement of the QT interval on the 12-lead body-surface ECG is challenging in daily practice. Even more difficult is its correct estimation in the presence of repolarization abnormalities, arrhythmias or bundle-branch blocks (BBB). The QT interval results from two parts of the ECG: (1) the QRS complex, describing the excitation of the ventricles and (2) the JT interval, describing the repolarisation of the ventricles. Prolongation of the QRS width – like in the presence of BBB – entails prolongation of the QT interval, making the estimation of the true repolarisation time challenging. The US recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the ECG suggest focusing on the JT interval in presence of BBB. However, in clinical practice physicians have become more familiar with the interpretation of QT-interval measurements than with the interpretation of the JT Interval. In the last decade, a simple formula for the estimation of the “modified QT interval” in the presence of left or right BBB has been developed and evaluated. In this formula, the modified QT interval is calculated by subtracting 50% of the length of the BBB-QRS from the measured QT interval (QTm = QTBBB − 50% QRSBBB). Subsequently, rate-correction formula should be applied as usual. In this review, we discuss the determination of the QT-interval in the presence of BBB and summarize the origin and application of the modified QT-interval formula.
AB - Proper measurement of the QT interval on the 12-lead body-surface ECG is challenging in daily practice. Even more difficult is its correct estimation in the presence of repolarization abnormalities, arrhythmias or bundle-branch blocks (BBB). The QT interval results from two parts of the ECG: (1) the QRS complex, describing the excitation of the ventricles and (2) the JT interval, describing the repolarisation of the ventricles. Prolongation of the QRS width – like in the presence of BBB – entails prolongation of the QT interval, making the estimation of the true repolarisation time challenging. The US recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the ECG suggest focusing on the JT interval in presence of BBB. However, in clinical practice physicians have become more familiar with the interpretation of QT-interval measurements than with the interpretation of the JT Interval. In the last decade, a simple formula for the estimation of the “modified QT interval” in the presence of left or right BBB has been developed and evaluated. In this formula, the modified QT interval is calculated by subtracting 50% of the length of the BBB-QRS from the measured QT interval (QTm = QTBBB − 50% QRSBBB). Subsequently, rate-correction formula should be applied as usual. In this review, we discuss the determination of the QT-interval in the presence of BBB and summarize the origin and application of the modified QT-interval formula.
KW - JT interval
KW - Left bundle branch block
KW - Long QT
KW - QT formula
KW - QT interval
KW - Right bundle branch block
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091348606&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100636
DO - 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100636
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85091348606
SN - 2352-9067
VL - 30
JO - IJC Heart and Vasculature
JF - IJC Heart and Vasculature
M1 - 100636
ER -