TY - JOUR
T1 - Pulmonary stretch receptor activity during partial liquid ventilation with different pressure waveforms
AU - Rieger-Fackeldey, Esther
AU - Jonzon, Anders
AU - Schulze, Andreas
AU - Sedin, Gunnar
AU - Sindelar, Richard
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020
PY - 2020/5
Y1 - 2020/5
N2 - Background: The aim of the present study was to investigate pulmonary stretch receptor activity (PSR) under different peak inspiratory pressures (PIPs) and inspiratory pressure waveforms during partial liquid (PLV) and gas ventilation (GV). Methods: PSR instantaneous impulse frequency (PSRfimp) was recorded from single fibers in the vagal nerve during PLV and GV in young cats. PIPs were set at 1.2/1.8/2.2/2.7 kPa, and square and sinusoidal pressure waveforms were applied. Results: PSRfimp at the start of inspiration increased with increasing PIPs, and was steeper and higher with square than with sinusoidal waveforms (p < 0.05). Total number of impulses, peak and mean PSRfimp were lower during PLV than GV at the lowest and highest PIPs (p < 0.025). Time to peak PSRfimp was shorter with square than with sinusoidal waveforms at all pressures and ventilations (p < 0.005). Irrespective of waveform, lower PIPs yielded lower ventilation during PLV. Conclusion: As assessed by PSRfimp, increased PIPs do not expose the lungs to more stretching during PLV than during GV, with only minor differences between square and sinusoidal waveforms.
AB - Background: The aim of the present study was to investigate pulmonary stretch receptor activity (PSR) under different peak inspiratory pressures (PIPs) and inspiratory pressure waveforms during partial liquid (PLV) and gas ventilation (GV). Methods: PSR instantaneous impulse frequency (PSRfimp) was recorded from single fibers in the vagal nerve during PLV and GV in young cats. PIPs were set at 1.2/1.8/2.2/2.7 kPa, and square and sinusoidal pressure waveforms were applied. Results: PSRfimp at the start of inspiration increased with increasing PIPs, and was steeper and higher with square than with sinusoidal waveforms (p < 0.05). Total number of impulses, peak and mean PSRfimp were lower during PLV than GV at the lowest and highest PIPs (p < 0.025). Time to peak PSRfimp was shorter with square than with sinusoidal waveforms at all pressures and ventilations (p < 0.005). Irrespective of waveform, lower PIPs yielded lower ventilation during PLV. Conclusion: As assessed by PSRfimp, increased PIPs do not expose the lungs to more stretching during PLV than during GV, with only minor differences between square and sinusoidal waveforms.
KW - Control of breathing
KW - Partial liquid ventilation
KW - Pressure controlled ventilation
KW - Slowly adapting pulmonary stretch receptor
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079284350&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.resp.2020.103413
DO - 10.1016/j.resp.2020.103413
M3 - Article
C2 - 32044447
AN - SCOPUS:85079284350
SN - 1569-9048
VL - 276
JO - Respiratory Physiology and Neurobiology
JF - Respiratory Physiology and Neurobiology
M1 - 103413
ER -