Abstract
The number of people witnessing or experiencing gender discrimination at work is still high around the globe. While the existing literature has investigated potential mechanisms underlying gender discrimination and the consequences of experiencing gender discrimination at work, it remains unclear how third-party observers—as opposed to employees or coworkers—react to specific instances of workplace gender discrimination. The results of six experiments demonstrate that (a) people in general judge organizational decisions that discriminate against individual male (vs. female) workers as more legitimate and (b) this difference in legitimacy judgments is significantly greater among women than men. This discrepancy in legitimacy judgments occurs because women (more than men) consider the collective situation of female and male workers when judging the legitimacy of organizational decisions that discriminate against individual workers based on gender. These findings document how group-level concerns shape people’s legitimacy judgments of organizational decisions discriminating against individuals and equip organizations and policymakers with a better understanding of people’s polarized opinions regarding gender discrimination at the workplace.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 451-466 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 5 May 2022 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- gender discrimination
- gender inequality
- justice
- legitimacy
- public reactions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Public Reactions to Instances of Workplace Gender Discrimination'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver