Abstract
This paper develops a formal model to disentangle the competing political incentives for redistribution, expropriation, and market openness. Although redistribution and expropriation are both types of government extraction, redistribution re-allocates wealth within the citizenry, while expropriation re-allocates wealth from citizens to the government. Representative political institutions increase redistribution and reduce expropriation. Market openness changes these incentives, as foreign investors prefer reductions in both redistribution and expropriation. When political institutions are representative, the government will rely more on reducing expropriation, rather than limiting redistribution, to attract foreign investment. Under representative institutions then, openness partially reinforces the preferences of voters rather than undermining them. In addition, market liberalization occurs only when the policy changes needed to attract foreign investment are relatively small. If existing policies are satisfactory to foreign investors, moves toward openness may be accompanied by greater redistribution and expropriation, as governments are tempted by a larger base for extraction. Thus, openness has ambiguous effects on economic policy, at times encouraging and at times constraining extraction.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 181-210 |
Number of pages | 30 |
Journal | Economics and Politics |
Volume | 30 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jul 2018 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- game theory
- globalization/integration
- growth/economic development
- international political economy
- macroeconomic political economy
- macroeconomic political economy
- microfoundations of political economy
- property rights
- redistribution