Prostate158 - An expert-annotated 3T MRI dataset and algorithm for prostate cancer detection

Lisa C. Adams, Marcus R. Makowski, Günther Engel, Maximilian Rattunde, Felix Busch, Patrick Asbach, Stefan M. Niehues, Shankeeth Vinayahalingam, Bram van Ginneken, Geert Litjens, Keno K. Bressem

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

47 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The development of deep learning (DL) models for prostate segmentation on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) depends on expert-annotated data and reliable baselines, which are often not publicly available. This limits both reproducibility and comparability. Methods: Prostate158 consists of 158 expert annotated biparametric 3T prostate MRIs comprising T2w sequences and diffusion-weighted sequences with apparent diffusion coefficient maps. Two U-ResNets trained for segmentation of anatomy (central gland, peripheral zone) and suspicious lesions for prostate cancer (PCa) with a PI-RADS score of ≥4 served as baseline algorithms. Segmentation performance was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), the Hausdorff distance (HD), and the average surface distance (ASD). The Wilcoxon test with Bonferroni correction was used to evaluate differences in performance. The generalizability of the baseline model was assessed using the open datasets Medical Segmentation Decathlon and PROSTATEx. Results: Compared to Reader 1, the models achieved a DSC/HD/ASD of 0.88/18.3/2.2 for the central gland, 0.75/22.8/1.9 for the peripheral zone, and 0.45/36.7/17.4 for PCa. Compared with Reader 2, the DSC/HD/ASD were 0.88/17.5/2.6 for the central gland, 0.73/33.2/1.9 for the peripheral zone, and 0.4/39.5/19.1 for PCa. Interrater agreement measured in DSC/HD/ASD was 0.87/11.1/1.0 for the central gland, 0.75/15.8/0.74 for the peripheral zone, and 0.6/18.8/5.5 for PCa. Segmentation performances on the Medical Segmentation Decathlon and PROSTATEx were 0.82/22.5/3.4; 0.86/18.6/2.5 for the central gland, and 0.64/29.2/4.7; 0.71/26.3/2.2 for the peripheral zone. Conclusions: We provide an openly accessible, expert-annotated 3T dataset of prostate MRI and a reproducible benchmark to foster the development of prostate segmentation algorithms.

Original languageEnglish
Article number105817
JournalComputers in Biology and Medicine
Volume148
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2022

Keywords

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Biparametric prostate MRI
  • Deep learning
  • Machine learning
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Prostate cancer

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prostate158 - An expert-annotated 3T MRI dataset and algorithm for prostate cancer detection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this