Proposed changes in the classification of carcinogenic chemicals in the work area

Hans Günter Neumann, Heinz Walter Thielmann, Johannes G. Filser, Hans Peter Gelbke, Helmut Greim, Hermann Kappus, Klaus H. Norpoth, Ulrike Reuter, Spyridon Vamvakas, Peter Wardenbach, H. Erich Wichmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

Carcinogenic chemicals in the work area are currently classified into three categories in Section III of the German List of MAK and BAT Values. This classification is based on qualitative criteria and reflects essentially the weight of evidence available for judging the carcinogenic potential of the chemicals. It is proposed that these Categories - IIIA1, IIIA2, and IIIB - be retained as Categories 1, 2, and 3, to conform with EU regulations. On the basis of our advancing knowledge of reaction mechanisms and the potency of carcinogens, it is now proposed that these three categories be supplemented with two additional categories. The essential feature of substances classified in the new categories is that exposure to these chemicals does not convey a significant risk of cancer to man, provided that an appropriate exposure limit (MAK value) is observed. It is proposed that chemicals known to act typically by nongenotoxic mechanisms and for which information is available that allows evaluation of the effects of low-dose exposures be classified in Category 4. Genotoxic chemicals for which low carcinogenic potency can be expected on the basis of dose-response relationships and toxicokinetics and for which risk at low doses can be assessed will be classified in Category 5. The basis for a better differentiation of carcinogens is discussed, the new categories are defined, and possible criteria for classification are described. Examples for Category 4 (1,4-dioxane) and Category 5 (styrene) are presented. The proposed changes in classifying carcinogenic chemicals in the work area are presented for further discussion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)288-295
Number of pages8
JournalRegulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1997
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cancer risk
  • Chemical carcinogens
  • List of MAK and BAt values

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Proposed changes in the classification of carcinogenic chemicals in the work area'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this