TY - JOUR
T1 - Prognostic Value of Tumor Volume in Glioblastoma Patients
T2 - Size Also Matters for Patients with Incomplete Resection
AU - Bette, Stefanie
AU - Barz, Melanie
AU - Wiestler, Benedikt
AU - Huber, Thomas
AU - Gerhardt, Julia
AU - Buchmann, Niels
AU - E. Combs, Stephanie
AU - Schmidt-Graf, Friederike
AU - Delbridge, Claire
AU - Zimmer, Claus
AU - S. Kirschke, Jan
AU - Meyer, Bernhard
AU - Ryang, Yu Mi
AU - Ringel, Florian
AU - Gempt, Jens
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Society of Surgical Oncology.
PY - 2018/2/1
Y1 - 2018/2/1
N2 - Background: Incomplete resection of glioblastoma is discussed controversially in the era of combined radiochemotherapy. Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the benefit of subtotal tumor resection for glioblastoma patients as this was recently questioned in the era of radiochemotherapy. Methods: Overall, 209 patients undergoing surgery for newly diagnosed WHO grade IV gliomas were retrospectively analyzed, and pre- and postoperative tumor volumes were manually segmented (cm3). Survival analyses were performed, including prognostic factors such as age, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status, and adjuvant treatment regimen. Results: Pre- and postoperative tumor volume is significantly associated with pre- and postoperative KPS, as well as age (p < 0.001). Postoperative tumor volume remained a significant prognostic factor in a multivariate analysis, independent of other prognostic factors (hazard ratio 1.0365, 95% confidence interval 1.0235–1.0497, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In the era of molecularly-driven radiochemotherapy, glioblastoma surgery remains a major prognostic factor. Even in situations in which a gross total resection cannot be achieved, maximum safe reduction of tumor burden should be attempted.
AB - Background: Incomplete resection of glioblastoma is discussed controversially in the era of combined radiochemotherapy. Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the benefit of subtotal tumor resection for glioblastoma patients as this was recently questioned in the era of radiochemotherapy. Methods: Overall, 209 patients undergoing surgery for newly diagnosed WHO grade IV gliomas were retrospectively analyzed, and pre- and postoperative tumor volumes were manually segmented (cm3). Survival analyses were performed, including prognostic factors such as age, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status, and adjuvant treatment regimen. Results: Pre- and postoperative tumor volume is significantly associated with pre- and postoperative KPS, as well as age (p < 0.001). Postoperative tumor volume remained a significant prognostic factor in a multivariate analysis, independent of other prognostic factors (hazard ratio 1.0365, 95% confidence interval 1.0235–1.0497, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In the era of molecularly-driven radiochemotherapy, glioblastoma surgery remains a major prognostic factor. Even in situations in which a gross total resection cannot be achieved, maximum safe reduction of tumor burden should be attempted.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034615968&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1245/s10434-017-6253-0
DO - 10.1245/s10434-017-6253-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 29159745
AN - SCOPUS:85034615968
SN - 1068-9265
VL - 25
SP - 558
EP - 564
JO - Annals of Surgical Oncology
JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology
IS - 2
ER -