TY - JOUR
T1 - Preventive effect of hydrolyzed infant formulas persists until age 6 years
T2 - Long-term results from the German Infant Nutritional Intervention Study (GINI)
AU - von Berg, Andrea
AU - Filipiak-Pittroff, Birgit
AU - Krämer, Ursula
AU - Link, Elke
AU - Bollrath, Christina
AU - Brockow, Inken
AU - Koletzko, Sibylle
AU - Grübl, Armin
AU - Heinrich, Joachim
AU - Wichmann, H. Erich
AU - Bauer, Carl P.
AU - Reinhardt, Dietrich
AU - Berdel, Dietrich
N1 - Funding Information:
The German Infant Nutritional Intervention study was supported for the first 3 years by grants of the Federal Ministry for Education, Science, Research and Technology (Grant No. 01 EE 9401-4). The 6-year follow-up was partly funded by the Federal Ministry for Environment (IUF, FKZ 20462296) and by the GSF National Research Center for the Environment and Health.
Funding Information:
Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: A. von Berg has served on the speakers' bureau for MSD, Nestlé, Novartis, and Aerocrine; has served as the principal investigator for Nestlé, Mead Johnson, GlaxoSmithKline, Aerocrine, Nycomed, MSD, Allergopharma, and ALK-Abelló; and has served as an expert witness for Aerocrine and Novartis. U. Krämer has received research support from the Deutsche gesetzliche Unfallversicherung and the Federal Ministry for Environment. E. Link has received research support from the Federal Ministry for Environment. S. Koletzko has received honoraria from Nestlé, Nutricia, and Hipp and has served as an investigator for Nestlé. D. Berdel has served on the speakers' bureau for MSD, Nestlé, and Wyeth. The rest of the authors have declared that they have no conflict of interest.
PY - 2008/6
Y1 - 2008/6
N2 - Background: The long-term effect of nutritional intervention with hydrolyzed infant formulas on allergy development has not been sufficiently evaluated. Objective: We performed a follow-up of the German Infant Nutritional Intervention study until 6 years of life to investigate the long-term allergy-preventive effect of 3 hydrolyzed infant formulas compared with cow's milk formula (CMF) in a randomized, double-blind trial. Methods: Between 1995 and 1998, 2252 newborns with atopic heredity were randomly assigned at birth to receive one of 4 blinded formulas: partially or extensively hydrolyzed whey formula, extensively hydrolyzed casein formula, or CMF as milk substitute for the first 4 months when breast-feeding was insufficient. The cohort was followed from birth until 6 years of age with yearly questionnaires. Outcomes were physician-diagnosed allergic diseases (atopic dermatitis, food allergy, allergic urticaria, asthma, and hay fever/allergic rhinitis). Log-binomial regression modeled with generalized estimation equations was used for the statistical analysis. Results: In the intent-to-treat analysis the relative risk of a physician's diagnosis of allergic manifestation (AM) compared with CMF was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.70-0.96) for partially hydrolyzed whey formula, 0.90 (95% CI, 0.78-1.04) for extensively hydrolyzed whey formula, and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.69-0.93) for extensively hydrolyzed casein formula. The corresponding figures for atopic eczema were 0.79 (95% CI, 0.64-0.97), 0.92 (95% CI, 0.76-1.11), and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.58-0.88), respectively. In the per-protocol analysis all effects were stronger and significant. No significant effect on other AMs was found. Conclusion: The data confirm a long-term allergy-preventive effect of hydrolyzed infant formulas on AM and atopic eczema until 6 years of age.
AB - Background: The long-term effect of nutritional intervention with hydrolyzed infant formulas on allergy development has not been sufficiently evaluated. Objective: We performed a follow-up of the German Infant Nutritional Intervention study until 6 years of life to investigate the long-term allergy-preventive effect of 3 hydrolyzed infant formulas compared with cow's milk formula (CMF) in a randomized, double-blind trial. Methods: Between 1995 and 1998, 2252 newborns with atopic heredity were randomly assigned at birth to receive one of 4 blinded formulas: partially or extensively hydrolyzed whey formula, extensively hydrolyzed casein formula, or CMF as milk substitute for the first 4 months when breast-feeding was insufficient. The cohort was followed from birth until 6 years of age with yearly questionnaires. Outcomes were physician-diagnosed allergic diseases (atopic dermatitis, food allergy, allergic urticaria, asthma, and hay fever/allergic rhinitis). Log-binomial regression modeled with generalized estimation equations was used for the statistical analysis. Results: In the intent-to-treat analysis the relative risk of a physician's diagnosis of allergic manifestation (AM) compared with CMF was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.70-0.96) for partially hydrolyzed whey formula, 0.90 (95% CI, 0.78-1.04) for extensively hydrolyzed whey formula, and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.69-0.93) for extensively hydrolyzed casein formula. The corresponding figures for atopic eczema were 0.79 (95% CI, 0.64-0.97), 0.92 (95% CI, 0.76-1.11), and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.58-0.88), respectively. In the per-protocol analysis all effects were stronger and significant. No significant effect on other AMs was found. Conclusion: The data confirm a long-term allergy-preventive effect of hydrolyzed infant formulas on AM and atopic eczema until 6 years of age.
KW - Birth cohort
KW - double-blind randomized trial
KW - hydrolysates
KW - long-term allergy prevention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44649173722&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.04.021
DO - 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.04.021
M3 - Article
C2 - 18539195
AN - SCOPUS:44649173722
SN - 0091-6749
VL - 121
SP - 1442
EP - 1447
JO - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
JF - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
IS - 6
ER -