Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Prevalence and severity of coronary artery disease and adverse events among symptomatic patients with coronary artery calcification scores of zero undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography: Results from the CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International Multicenter) registry

  • Todd C. Villines
  • , Edward A. Hulten
  • , Leslee J. Shaw
  • , Manju Goyal
  • , Allison Dunning
  • , Stephan Achenbach
  • , Mouaz Al-Mallah
  • , Daniel S. Berman
  • , Matthew J. Budoff
  • , Filippo Cademartiri
  • , Tracy Q. Callister
  • , Hyuk Jae Chang
  • , Victor Y. Cheng
  • , Kavitha Chinnaiyan
  • , Benjamin J.W. Chow
  • , Augustin Delago
  • , Martin Hadamitzky
  • , Jörg Hausleiter
  • , Philipp Kaufmann
  • , Fay Y. Lin
  • Erica Maffei, Gilbert L. Raff, James K. Min
  • Walter Reed Medical Center
  • Emory University School of Medicine
  • New York-Presbyterian Hospital
  • Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen
  • Henry Ford Hospital
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
  • Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
  • University Hospital of Parma
  • Erasmus University Medical Center
  • Tennessee Heart and Vascular Institute
  • Severance Cardiovascular Hospital
  • William Beaumont Hospital
  • University of Ottawa
  • Capitol Cardiology Associates
  • Technical University of Munich
  • University Hospital Zurich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

365 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to describe the prevalence and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) in relation to prognosis in symptomatic patients without coronary artery calcification (CAC) undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Background: The frequency and clinical relevance of CAD in patients without CAC are unclear. Methods: We identified 10,037 symptomatic patients without CAD who underwent concomitant CCTA and CAC scoring. CAD was assessed as <50%, ≥50%, and ≥70% stenosis. All-cause mortality and the composite endpoint of mortality, myocardial infarction, or late coronary revascularization (≥90 days after CCTA) were assessed. Results: Mean age was 57 years, 56% were men, and 51% had a CAC score of 0. Among patients with a CAC score of 0, 84% had no CAD, 13% had nonobstructive stenosis, and 3.5% had ≥50% stenosis (1.4% had ≥70% stenosis) on CCTA. A CAC score >0 had a sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values for stenosis ≥50% of 89%, 59%, 96%, and 29%, respectively. During a median of 2.1 years, there was no difference in mortality among patients with a CAC score of 0 irrespective of obstructive CAD. Among 8,907 patients with follow-up for the composite endpoint, 3.9% with a CAC score of 0 and ≥50% stenosis experienced an event (hazard ratio: 5.7; 95% confidence interval: 2.5 to 13.1; p < 0.001) compared with 0.8% of patients with a CAC score of 0 and no obstructive CAD. Receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that the CAC score did not add incremental prognostic information compared with CAD extent on CCTA for the composite endpoint (CCTA area under the curve = 0.825; CAC + CCTA area under the curve = 0.826; p = 0.84). Conclusions: In symptomatic patients with a CAC score of 0, obstructive CAD is possible and is associated with increased cardiovascular events. CAC scoring did not add incremental prognostic information to CCTA.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2533-2540
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume58
Issue number24
DOIs
StatePublished - 6 Dec 2011

Keywords

  • computed tomography
  • coronary artery disease
  • coronary calcium score
  • coronary computed tomography angiography
  • prognosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prevalence and severity of coronary artery disease and adverse events among symptomatic patients with coronary artery calcification scores of zero undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography: Results from the CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International Multicenter) registry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this