TY - JOUR
T1 - Pregnancy does not accelerate biological valve degeneration
AU - Cleuziou, Julie
AU - Hörer, Jürgen
AU - Kaemmerer, Harald
AU - Teodorowicz, Alexandra
AU - Kasnar-Samprec, Jelena
AU - Schreiber, Christian
AU - Lange, Rüdiger
PY - 2010/12/3
Y1 - 2010/12/3
N2 - Background: Pregnancy in women with biological heart valve prosthesis might lead to a faster degeneration of the prosthesis. We analyzed the rate of prosthesis replacement and the outcome of pregnancies in women with biological valve prosthesis. Methods: Between 1976 and 2006, 100 female patients aged 18-40 years at time of the study, underwent a valve replacement with a bioprosthesis or a homograft. At a mean interval of 10.8 ± 8 years, 87 patients were evaluated by a questionnaire. Results: A biological prosthesis was implanted in 45 patients (52%), while 42 patients (48%) received a homograft. After valve replacement, 33 patients (38%) had a total of 56 pregnancies with a live-birth rate of 77% (n = 43). There were 9 (16%) miscarriages, 4 (7%) therapeutic abortions and no stillbirths. There was no maternal death, thromboembolic event or structural valve deterioration during pregnancy. Out of 87 patients, 31 (36%) required a valve re-replacement at a mean time of 9.5 ± 5 years. Neither age, valve type, valve position nor pregnancy were a risk factor for a valve re-replacement. The freedom from valve re-replacement at 5 and 10 years, was 96 ± 3% and 73 ± 9%, respectively for patients after a pregnancy compared to 93 ± 4% and 52 ± 10%, respectively for patients without a pregnancy (p = 0.2). Conclusions: Pregnancy does not accelerate the risk for replacement of a biological heart valve prosthesis. Pregnancy in women with biological heart valves can be carried out without increased morbidity related to the implanted valve.
AB - Background: Pregnancy in women with biological heart valve prosthesis might lead to a faster degeneration of the prosthesis. We analyzed the rate of prosthesis replacement and the outcome of pregnancies in women with biological valve prosthesis. Methods: Between 1976 and 2006, 100 female patients aged 18-40 years at time of the study, underwent a valve replacement with a bioprosthesis or a homograft. At a mean interval of 10.8 ± 8 years, 87 patients were evaluated by a questionnaire. Results: A biological prosthesis was implanted in 45 patients (52%), while 42 patients (48%) received a homograft. After valve replacement, 33 patients (38%) had a total of 56 pregnancies with a live-birth rate of 77% (n = 43). There were 9 (16%) miscarriages, 4 (7%) therapeutic abortions and no stillbirths. There was no maternal death, thromboembolic event or structural valve deterioration during pregnancy. Out of 87 patients, 31 (36%) required a valve re-replacement at a mean time of 9.5 ± 5 years. Neither age, valve type, valve position nor pregnancy were a risk factor for a valve re-replacement. The freedom from valve re-replacement at 5 and 10 years, was 96 ± 3% and 73 ± 9%, respectively for patients after a pregnancy compared to 93 ± 4% and 52 ± 10%, respectively for patients without a pregnancy (p = 0.2). Conclusions: Pregnancy does not accelerate the risk for replacement of a biological heart valve prosthesis. Pregnancy in women with biological heart valves can be carried out without increased morbidity related to the implanted valve.
KW - Bioprosthesis
KW - Pregnancy
KW - Valves
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649965939&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.04.095
DO - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.04.095
M3 - Article
C2 - 20605238
AN - SCOPUS:78649965939
SN - 0167-5273
VL - 145
SP - 418
EP - 421
JO - International Journal of Cardiology
JF - International Journal of Cardiology
IS - 3
ER -