Preferential oxidation of CO over Pt/γ-Al2O3 and Au/α-Fe2O3: Reactor design calculations and experimental results

M. J. Kahlich, H. A. Gasteiger, R. J. Behm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

42 Scopus citations

Abstract

We present calculations of the required oxygen excess and noble metal mass together with integral flow experiments for the preferential oxidation (PROX) of CO in simulated reformer gas (1% CO, low concentrations of O2, 75% H2, balance N2) over Pt/γ-Al2O3 at 200°C and Au/α-Fe2O3 at 80°C under different load conditions, i.e., at different contact times. The calculations are based on kinetic data of both catalysts determined in differential flow experiments. It is demonstrated that these calculations give realistic values for the minimum noble metal mass and the oyxgen excess required for a desired CO conversion. At optimum contact-time, the minimum CO exit concentration on a Pt/γ-Al2O3 catalyst at 200°C was found to be 60 ppm, increasing to 200 ppm at five-fold higher contact-time. This is attributed to the reverse water-gas shift reaction taking place as a competing reaction to the selective CO oxidation over Pt/γ-Al2O3. On a Au/α-Fe2O3 catalyst, the minimum CO exit concentration of <3 ppm (detection limit) increases to 30 ppm by increasing the contact-time by a factor of five. A two-step PROX reactor using Pt/γ-Al2O3 in a first stage at 200°C to oxidize the majority of CO down to ∼1000 ppm and Au/α-Fe2O3 in a second stage at 80°C is proposed for the complete oxidation of CO under dynamic load conditions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-46
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical Systems
Volume1
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1998
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Au/α-FeO
  • CO oxidation
  • PROX
  • Preferential CO oxidation
  • Pt/γ-AlO
  • Selective
  • Water-gas shift

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Preferential oxidation of CO over Pt/γ-Al2O3 and Au/α-Fe2O3: Reactor design calculations and experimental results'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this