TY - GEN
T1 - Preemption points placement for sporadic task sets
AU - Bertogna, Marko
AU - Buttazzo, Giorgio
AU - Marinoni, Mauro
AU - Yao, Gang
AU - Esposito, Francesco
AU - Caccamo, Marco
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - Limited preemption scheduling has been introduced as a viable alternative to non-preemptive and fully-preemptive scheduling when reduced blocking times need to coexist with an acceptable context switch overhead. To achieve this goal, preemptions are allowed only at selected points of the code of each task, decreasing the preemption overhead and simplifying the estimation of worst-case execution parameters. Unfortunately, the problem of how to place these preemption points is rather complex and has not been solved. In this paper, a method is presented for the optimal placement of preemption points under simplifying conditions, namely, a fixed preemption overhead at each point. We will prove that if our method is not able to produce a feasible schedule, then no other possible preemption point placement (including non-preemptive and fully preemptive scheduling) can find a schedulable solution. The presented method is general enough to be applicable to both EDF and Fixed Priority scheduling, with limited modifications.
AB - Limited preemption scheduling has been introduced as a viable alternative to non-preemptive and fully-preemptive scheduling when reduced blocking times need to coexist with an acceptable context switch overhead. To achieve this goal, preemptions are allowed only at selected points of the code of each task, decreasing the preemption overhead and simplifying the estimation of worst-case execution parameters. Unfortunately, the problem of how to place these preemption points is rather complex and has not been solved. In this paper, a method is presented for the optimal placement of preemption points under simplifying conditions, namely, a fixed preemption overhead at each point. We will prove that if our method is not able to produce a feasible schedule, then no other possible preemption point placement (including non-preemptive and fully preemptive scheduling) can find a schedulable solution. The presented method is general enough to be applicable to both EDF and Fixed Priority scheduling, with limited modifications.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77958452238&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ECRTS.2010.9
DO - 10.1109/ECRTS.2010.9
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:77958452238
SN - 9780769541112
T3 - Proceedings - Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems
SP - 251
EP - 260
BT - Proceedings - 22nd Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems, ECRTS 2010
T2 - 22nd Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems, ECRTS 2010
Y2 - 6 July 2010 through 9 July 2010
ER -