TY - GEN
T1 - Predictive control vs. linear control for current control of a single-leg inverter
AU - Mouton, Toit
AU - Stolze, Peter
AU - Geyer, Tobias
AU - Tomlinson, Males
AU - Kennel, Ralph
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - This paper presents a comparison of a predictive control scheme with a linear regulator for current control of a single-leg inverter driving a resistive-inductive load with back-EMF. The comparison is motivated by the fact that in most comparisons the linear regulator is not tuned optimally, i.e. it is just providing a suboptimal result. In this paper an oversampled linear resonant regulator is compared to a regularly sampled deadbeat-like predictive control scheme. Due to the fact that both controllers should be implemented on an FPGA for a first approximation it is assumed that the control outputs can be calculated within one FPGA clock cycle. The future reference values are unknown and - despite this fact - the reference should be tracked as accurately as possible. It will be shown that in general a predictive control formulation leads to one sample delay which must not be confused with the more familiar calculation delay for software-based implementations of regularly sampled controller implementations.
AB - This paper presents a comparison of a predictive control scheme with a linear regulator for current control of a single-leg inverter driving a resistive-inductive load with back-EMF. The comparison is motivated by the fact that in most comparisons the linear regulator is not tuned optimally, i.e. it is just providing a suboptimal result. In this paper an oversampled linear resonant regulator is compared to a regularly sampled deadbeat-like predictive control scheme. Due to the fact that both controllers should be implemented on an FPGA for a first approximation it is assumed that the control outputs can be calculated within one FPGA clock cycle. The future reference values are unknown and - despite this fact - the reference should be tracked as accurately as possible. It will be shown that in general a predictive control formulation leads to one sample delay which must not be confused with the more familiar calculation delay for software-based implementations of regularly sampled controller implementations.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84894483754
U2 - 10.1109/SLED-PRECEDE.2013.6684479
DO - 10.1109/SLED-PRECEDE.2013.6684479
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84894483754
SN - 9781479906819
T3 - SLED/PRECEDE 2013 - 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Sensorless Control for Electrical Drives and Predictive Control of Electrical Drives and Power Electronics
BT - SLED/PRECEDE 2013 - 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Sensorless Control for Electrical Drives and Predictive Control of Electrical Drives and Power Electronics
PB - IEEE Computer Society
T2 - 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Sensorless Control for Electrical Drives and Predictive Control of Electrical Drives and Power Electronics, SLED/PRECEDE 2013
Y2 - 17 October 2013 through 19 October 2013
ER -